Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
10.55041/IJSREM32427
Volume:
8 |
5 |
May 2024
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Forecasting rainfall, crucial for agriculture, water management, and disaster preparedness, presents significant challenges due to intricate relationships often missed by conventional statistical methods. Hence, machine learning (ML) models offer promising alternatives, enhancing the precision and dependability of rainfall predictions. This paper presents a comprehensive comparison of various ML models with diverse model structures and regularization strategies for rainfall prediction in urban metropolitan cities. The results show that the random forest model, and gradient boosting model outperform the other models such as logistic regression, support vector machine (SVM), decision tree, K-nearest neighbor (KNN), Naive Bayes, linear SVM, and neural network in terms of accuracy. Validation accuracies of 75%, 77%, 68%, 78%, 76%, 78%, 74%, 75% and 76% were achieved for logistic regression, SVM, decision tree, random forest model, KNN, gradient boosting model, Naive Bayes, linear SVM, and neural network, respectively. The choice of ML models for rainfall prediction should consider the characteristics of the data, e.g. a lag feature for 20 days was employed that uses previous time steps to predict the next time step. The paper concludes that ML models, especially the random forest and gradient boosting models are powerful and robust tools for rainfall prediction in urban metropolitan cities.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
12/31/45415
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
0
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...