Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
10.55041/IJSREM31910
Volume:
8 |
4 |
Apr 2024
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
With the increasing needs of people, the demand for bank loans also rises. Each day, banks receive numerous loan applications from various customers and individuals, however, not all applicants are approved. Banks typically assess an applicant’s eligibility before processing a loan application, a process that can be time-consuming and complex. In evaluating loan applications and making credit decisions, banks often rely on their credit scoring and risk assessment systems. Nevertheless, there are still cases where some applicants default on their payments annually, resulting in significant financial losses for financial institutions. In this research, we utilized machine learning algorithms to analyze a dataset of approved loans and predict which applicants are most deserving of a loan. The study incorporates customers’ historical data, including factors such as age, income type, loan annuity, last credit bureau report, organization type, and length of employment. Various machine learning methods like Random Forest, XGBoost, Adaboost, Lightgbm, Decision tree, and K-Nearest Neighbor were utilized to identify the most influential features that impact prediction outcomes. These algorithms were then compared using standard metrics, with Logistic Regression achieving the highest accuracy rate of 92%.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
12/31/45408
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
1
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...