Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
10.55041/IJSREM37340
Volume:
8 |
9 |
Sep 2024
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
The broad adoption of machine learning (ML) models in many applications has sparked worries about their susceptibility to adversarial attacks, in which slight alterations to input data result in inaccurate model predictions. This study does a comparative examination of adversarial attack techniques on machine learning models, assessing their efficacy, complexity, and current mitigation measures. The analysis explores several attack methodologies, such as gradient-based, decision-based, and optimization-based methods. Each method exploits different flaws in machine learning models to create adversarial instances. An assessment is conducted to determine the vulnerability of different ML model designs, such as neural networks, support vector machines, and decision trees, to manipulation in light of these assaults. Additionally, the study investigates Défense measures, such as adversarial training, input pre-processing, and model robustness verification, that are designed to reduce the effects of adversarial attacks and improve the resilience of the model. This comparative research offers valuable insights into the changing environment of adversarial attacks on machine learning models, emphasizing the importance of implementing strong Défense mechanisms to protect against possible threats. This research aims to enhance the security and dependability of machine learning systems against hostile manipulation, hence promoting trust and confidence in their practical implementation.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
4/8/2024
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
1
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
3
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...