Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM26346
Volume:
7 |
10 |
Oct 2023
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
– Advertising ethics play a pivotal role in shaping consumer perceptions and influencing purchase decisions, particularly in the competitive landscape of the fast-food industry. This research paper conducts a comprehensive comparative analysis of the advertising ethics employed by two prominent fast-food giants, McDonald’s and Burger King, to shed light on their respective approaches to marketing food products. The study employs a mixed-methods approach, combining both qualitative and quantitative research methods. Qualitative analysis involves content analysis of advertisements, promotional campaigns, and social media strategies of both McDonald’s and Burger King. Additionally, quantitative research involves surveying consumers to gauge their perceptions of McDonald’s and Burger King’s advertising ethics. The survey explores the impact of advertising ethics on consumer trust, loyalty, and willingness to make purchase decisions. Preliminary findings suggest that while both McDonald’s and Burger King employ persuasive and sometimes controversial advertising tactics, they differ in their approach to ethics. McDonald’s tends to prioritize health-conscious messaging and transparency in its advertisements, which resonates positively with health-conscious consumers. In contrast, Burger King often employs humor and shock value in its advertising, which can polarize consumer perceptions. This research contributes to the broader discourse on advertising ethics and consumer behavior within the fast-food industry.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
10/28/2023
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
1
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...