Crossref DOIMemberCiteFactoropen accessissn
SJIF Impact Factor 8.659 | ISSN: 2582-3930
IJSREM Logo

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management

(Gateway to Global Scholars - An International, Scholarly, Multi-Disciplinary, Open Access Journal)

Peer-Reviewed Journal Designed to Meet UGC's Quality Parameters

HomeCurrent IssuePast IssuesPay OnlineConferencesEditorial BoardAbout UsContact Us
IJSREM

Loading article...

Follow Us

  • Google Scholar
  • ResearchGate
  • Academia.edu
  • Mendeley
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Instagram

Journal Policies

  • Peer Review Policy
  • Publication Ethics
  • Copyright Infringement
  • Refund & Cancellation Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Journal Identifiers & Licenses

  • ISSN Verified: 2582-3930ISSN Verified: 2582-3930
  • Crossref DOI: 10.55041Crossref DOI: 10.55041
  • SJIF Ranking: 08.659SJIF Ranking: 08.659
  • Licensed under CC BY 4.0Licensed under CC BY 4.0
  • ISO Certification: 9001:2015ISO Certification: 9001:2015
  • Indexed & Cited In: Google ScholarIndexed & Cited In: Google Scholar

Contact Us

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management (IJSREM)

#62/1, New No 7, 1st Cross, 2nd Main, Ganganagar, R T Nagar, Bangalore North, Bangalore, Karnataka, India – 560032
[email protected]+91 93911 67991
logos
logos
Working Hours

Mon – Sat: 9:00 AM – 6:00 PM

Sunday: 10:00 AM – 4:00 PM

+91 93911 67991

© 2026 IJSREM – International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management. This is an open-access journal. Articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
ArticlePeer ReviewedOpen AccessPlagiarism Passed
Paper ID:IJSREM67488

A Comparative Analysis of Keyword, Vector, and Hybrid Search Strategies for Enterprise Document Intelligence Platforms

Stream/Area:

-

Subject:

-

Paper ID:

IJSREM67488

Volume:

10 |

9 |

Sep 2026

Pages:

1-7

Publication Frequency:

Monthly (12 issues per year)

DOI
Digital Object Identifier
Not assigned

License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

Share this article:

Authors

TMP

Tanmay Magesh Pawar

Information Technology and Computer Science

D. G. Ruparel College

Download Author Certificate
ASG

Aarti Sanjay Gawai

Information Technology and Computer Science

D. G. Ruparel College

Download Co-Author Certificate

Author Services & Downloads

Full ArticlesAcceptance Certificate

Abstract

Organizations today store large amounts of information in digital documents such as company policies, technical manuals, reports, contracts, employee records, research documents, and product documentation. As the amount of digital information increases, finding the required information quickly and accurately becomes an important challenge. Search technology plays an important role in solving this problem. Three important approaches used for document retrieval are keyword-based search, vector-based search, and hybrid search. Keyword search mainly identifies documents by matching words in the user query with words present in documents. Vector search represents text as numerical embeddings and retrieves documents based on semantic similarity. Hybrid search combines keyword and vector retrieval to use both exact matching and semantic understanding. This study presents a comparative analysis of these three search strategies for enterprise document intelligence platforms. The research uses secondary data obtained from existing studies published in the area of information retrieval, semantic search, enterprise search, and hybrid retrieval. The selected studies are examined according to their retrieval approach, application area, evaluation methods, reported findings, advantages, and limitations. The analysis shows that keyword search remains useful for exact terms, technical identifiers, and situations where fast retrieval is important. Vector search provides advantages for natural-language queries and situations where the meaning of the query is more important than exact word matching. Hybrid search combines both approaches and can provide a more flexible retrieval mechanism for mixed query types. However, hybrid systems also introduce additional complexity and computational requirements. The study concludes that there is no single search strategy that is suitable for every enterprise retrieval problem. The appropriate approach depends on the type of documents, query characteristics, accuracy requirements, response-time requirements, and available system resources.

KEYWORDS

Keyword Search Vector Search Hybrid Search Document Retrieval Semantic Search Information Retrieval Enterprise Document Intelligence BM25.

Cite This Article

Tanmay Magesh Pawar, Aarti Sanjay Gawai, "A Comparative Analysis of Keyword, Vector, and Hybrid Search Strategies for Enterprise Document Intelligence Platforms," International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management, vol. 10, no. 9, pp. 1-7, Sep 2026.

Full Article/Conclusion

This research presented a comparative analysis of keyword, vector, and hybrid search strategies for enterprise document intelligence platforms. Keyword search remains an important retrieval technique because it provides strong exact matching and is useful for names, identifiers, codes, technical terms, and other situations where precise lexical matching is required. Vector search provides a different capability by focusing on semantic similarity. It can retrieve documents that express similar concepts even when the wording of the query and document is different. This makes it particularly useful for natural-language questions and semantic document discovery. Hybrid search combines keyword and vector retrieval. The reviewed research indicates that this approach can be useful when enterprise queries contain both semantic concepts and exact terminology. Hybrid retrieval can therefore provide a flexible solution for systems that must support different types of user queries. However, hybrid retrieval should not automatically be considered superior in every situation. It introduces additional components, computational requirements, and design decisions. Its effectiveness depends on the dataset, query type, retrieval models, fusion technique, and evaluation method. The overall analysis therefore suggests that the choice of retrieval strategy should be based on the requirements of the particular enterprise application. Keyword search remains suitable for exact retrieval, vector search is valuable for semantic retrieval, and hybrid search provides a balanced approach when both types of retrieval are required. A controlled experiment using the same documents, queries, hardware, and evaluation metrics would be a useful next step. Such an experiment could provide a more direct numerical comparison of the three approaches.

References

[1]   H. M. Tua and D. Fitrianah, “A lightweight privacy-preserving reranker enables customizable hybrid retrieval for enterprise document search,” Discover Computing, vol. 29, art. no. 89, 2026, doi: 10.1007/s10791-026-09993-z. [2] S. R. Kathi and A. Garg, “Enhancing Enterprise Application Search Using Retrieval-Augmented Generation: A Hybrid Indexing and Reasoning Approach,” European Journal of Information Technologies and Computer Science, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 13–19, 2026, doi: 10.24018/compute.2026.6.1.70183. [3]  C. Wu and Y. Lin, “Evidence-Unit Fairness and the Limits of Query-Adaptive Sparse-Dense Fusion in Financial Document Retrieval,” 2026. [4]   L. Kapanke, P. Stephan, and R. Mertens, “Transitioning from Classical to Hybrid Search: A Metric-Driven and Explainable Approach,” in 2026 International Conference on Semantic Computing (ICSC), pp. 221–225, 2026, doi: 10.1109/ICSC67292.2026.00037. [5]  B. C., “Semantic Search Engine Using AI Embeddings,” International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management, vol. 10, no. 6, 2026, doi: 10.55041/IJSREM64845. [6]  D. R. Prasad, R. Yegireddi, and P. Anjaneyulu, “A Hybrid RAG Framework for AI Powered Personalized Document Summarization and Contextual Querying,” in 2026 International Conference on Data Science and Business Systems, 2026, doi: 10.1109/ICDSBS69077.2026.11634727. [7]  H. L. Ngoc, “From Keywords to Context: An AI Agent for Natural Language Document Lookup in the Enterprise,” in 2025 RIVF International Conference on Computing and Communication Technologies, pp. 1151–1156, 2025, doi: 10.1109/RIVF68649.2025.11365175. [8]  R. Ruparel and S. Bussari, “Survey and Benchmarking of Retrieval Methods for Enterprise Retrieval-Augmented Generation,” in International Conference on Computer and Applications (ICCA) – Proceedings, 2025, doi: 10.1109/ICCA66035.2025.11430920. [9]  J. Zhu, J. Yuan, K. Yang, X. Chen, S. Yu, H. Lv, Y. Li, and B. Zheng, “An Experimental Evaluation of Hybrid Querying on Vectors,” Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 183–195, 2025, doi: 10.14778/3773749.3773757. [10]  C. N. Htun and M. P. Khin, “Efficiency Trade-offs and Design Choices in Hybrid Academic Information Retrieval,” in 2025 6th International Conference on Advanced Information Technologies  (ICAIT), 2025,  doi: 10.1109/ICAIT68809.2025.11236772.

Editorial & Review Transparency

Publication Date

9/26/2026

Peer Review Type

Double-Blind Peer Review

Review Rounds: 2

Documents

Review Report (Confidential)
Copyright Form (Office)

Article Metrics & Impact

Article Views

0

Total views since publication

PDF Downloads

1

Total downloads since publication

Geographic Reach

5

Indexing, Archiving & Preservation

Google Scholar
Academia
ResearchGate
Crossref
SSRN
Semantic Scholar
Thomson Reuters
WorldCat
Mendeley
OpenAlex
EBSCO
Zenodo

Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.

Ethics, Compliance & Transparency

Plagiarism Screening

This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.

Funding Information

No funding information available for this research.

Similar & Recommended Articles

Similar Articles by Topic

Related research in the same subject area

Loading similar articles...