Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM67488
Volume:
10 |
9 |
Sep 2026
Pages:
1-7
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Information Technology and Computer Science
D. G. Ruparel College
Information Technology and Computer Science
D. G. Ruparel College
Organizations today store large amounts of information in digital documents such as company policies, technical manuals, reports, contracts, employee records, research documents, and product documentation. As the amount of digital information increases, finding the required information quickly and accurately becomes an important challenge. Search technology plays an important role in solving this problem. Three important approaches used for document retrieval are keyword-based search, vector-based search, and hybrid search. Keyword search mainly identifies documents by matching words in the user query with words present in documents. Vector search represents text as numerical embeddings and retrieves documents based on semantic similarity. Hybrid search combines keyword and vector retrieval to use both exact matching and semantic understanding. This study presents a comparative analysis of these three search strategies for enterprise document intelligence platforms. The research uses secondary data obtained from existing studies published in the area of information retrieval, semantic search, enterprise search, and hybrid retrieval. The selected studies are examined according to their retrieval approach, application area, evaluation methods, reported findings, advantages, and limitations. The analysis shows that keyword search remains useful for exact terms, technical identifiers, and situations where fast retrieval is important. Vector search provides advantages for natural-language queries and situations where the meaning of the query is more important than exact word matching. Hybrid search combines both approaches and can provide a more flexible retrieval mechanism for mixed query types. However, hybrid systems also introduce additional complexity and computational requirements. The study concludes that there is no single search strategy that is suitable for every enterprise retrieval problem. The appropriate approach depends on the type of documents, query characteristics, accuracy requirements, response-time requirements, and available system resources.
KEYWORDS
This research presented a comparative analysis of keyword, vector, and hybrid search strategies for enterprise document intelligence platforms. Keyword search remains an important retrieval technique because it provides strong exact matching and is useful for names, identifiers, codes, technical terms, and other situations where precise lexical matching is required. Vector search provides a different capability by focusing on semantic similarity. It can retrieve documents that express similar concepts even when the wording of the query and document is different. This makes it particularly useful for natural-language questions and semantic document discovery. Hybrid search combines keyword and vector retrieval. The reviewed research indicates that this approach can be useful when enterprise queries contain both semantic concepts and exact terminology. Hybrid retrieval can therefore provide a flexible solution for systems that must support different types of user queries. However, hybrid retrieval should not automatically be considered superior in every situation. It introduces additional components, computational requirements, and design decisions. Its effectiveness depends on the dataset, query type, retrieval models, fusion technique, and evaluation method. The overall analysis therefore suggests that the choice of retrieval strategy should be based on the requirements of the particular enterprise application. Keyword search remains suitable for exact retrieval, vector search is valuable for semantic retrieval, and hybrid search provides a balanced approach when both types of retrieval are required. A controlled experiment using the same documents, queries, hardware, and evaluation metrics would be a useful next step. Such an experiment could provide a more direct numerical comparison of the three approaches.
[1] H. M. Tua and D. Fitrianah, “A lightweight privacy-preserving reranker enables customizable hybrid retrieval for enterprise document search,” Discover Computing, vol. 29, art. no. 89, 2026, doi: 10.1007/s10791-026-09993-z. [2] S. R. Kathi and A. Garg, “Enhancing Enterprise Application Search Using Retrieval-Augmented Generation: A Hybrid Indexing and Reasoning Approach,” European Journal of Information Technologies and Computer Science, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 13–19, 2026, doi: 10.24018/compute.2026.6.1.70183. [3] C. Wu and Y. Lin, “Evidence-Unit Fairness and the Limits of Query-Adaptive Sparse-Dense Fusion in Financial Document Retrieval,” 2026. [4] L. Kapanke, P. Stephan, and R. Mertens, “Transitioning from Classical to Hybrid Search: A Metric-Driven and Explainable Approach,” in 2026 International Conference on Semantic Computing (ICSC), pp. 221–225, 2026, doi: 10.1109/ICSC67292.2026.00037. [5] B. C., “Semantic Search Engine Using AI Embeddings,” International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management, vol. 10, no. 6, 2026, doi: 10.55041/IJSREM64845. [6] D. R. Prasad, R. Yegireddi, and P. Anjaneyulu, “A Hybrid RAG Framework for AI Powered Personalized Document Summarization and Contextual Querying,” in 2026 International Conference on Data Science and Business Systems, 2026, doi: 10.1109/ICDSBS69077.2026.11634727. [7] H. L. Ngoc, “From Keywords to Context: An AI Agent for Natural Language Document Lookup in the Enterprise,” in 2025 RIVF International Conference on Computing and Communication Technologies, pp. 1151–1156, 2025, doi: 10.1109/RIVF68649.2025.11365175. [8] R. Ruparel and S. Bussari, “Survey and Benchmarking of Retrieval Methods for Enterprise Retrieval-Augmented Generation,” in International Conference on Computer and Applications (ICCA) – Proceedings, 2025, doi: 10.1109/ICCA66035.2025.11430920. [9] J. Zhu, J. Yuan, K. Yang, X. Chen, S. Yu, H. Lv, Y. Li, and B. Zheng, “An Experimental Evaluation of Hybrid Querying on Vectors,” Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 183–195, 2025, doi: 10.14778/3773749.3773757. [10] C. N. Htun and M. P. Khin, “Efficiency Trade-offs and Design Choices in Hybrid Academic Information Retrieval,” in 2025 6th International Conference on Advanced Information Technologies (ICAIT), 2025, doi: 10.1109/ICAIT68809.2025.11236772.
Publication Date
9/26/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
1
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...