Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
10.55041/IJSREM.IBFE175
Volume:
|
|
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
In today’s competitive job market, networking plays a crucial role in securing internships and employment opportunities, especially for students and fresh graduates. With the rapid digitalization of recruitment processes, professional networking platforms like LinkedIn have emerged as powerful alternatives to traditional networking methods such as campus placements, personal references, career fairs, and alumni connections. This research paper aims to comparatively analyze the effectiveness of LinkedIn networking and traditional networking in helping students secure internships and employment. The study adopts a descriptive research design using primary data collected through structured questionnaires from students pursuing higher education. The findings indicate that LinkedIn provides wider reach, faster communication, and greater exposure to recruiters, while traditional networking offers trust-based referrals and personalized guidance. The study concludes that a blended approach combining both networking methods yields better career outcomes for students. In today’s competitive job market, students increasingly rely on both digital platforms and conventional methods to secure internships and employment opportunities. LinkedIn has emerged as a dominant professional networking platform, while traditional networking methods such as campus placements, referrals, career fairs, and personal contacts continue to play a significant role. This study aims to comparatively analyze the effectiveness of LinkedIn and traditional networking in securing internships and employment for students. The research is based on primary data collected through a structured questionnaire administered to undergraduate and postgraduate students, along with secondary data from journals, reports, and online sources. Statistical tools such as percentage analysis and hypothesis testing were used for data interpretation. The findings reveal that LinkedIn provides wider exposure, faster communication, and better access to recruiters, whereas traditional networking offers trust-based connections and structured placement opportunities. The study concludes that a hybrid approach combining LinkedIn and traditional networking yields better career outcomes for students. ·
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
1/28/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
1
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...