Crossref DOIMemberCiteFactoropen accessissn
SJIF Impact Factor 8.659 | ISSN: 2582-3930
IJSREM Logo

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management

(Gateway to Global Scholars - An International, Scholarly, Multi-Disciplinary, Open Access Journal)

Peer-Reviewed Journal Designed to Meet UGC's Quality Parameters

HomeCurrent IssuePast IssuesPay OnlineConferencesEditorial BoardAbout UsContact Us
IJSREM

Loading article...

Follow Us

  • Google Scholar
  • ResearchGate
  • Academia.edu
  • Mendeley
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Instagram

Journal Policies

  • Peer Review Policy
  • Publication Ethics
  • Copyright Infringement
  • Refund & Cancellation Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Journal Identifiers & Licenses

  • ISSN Verified: 2582-3930ISSN Verified: 2582-3930
  • Crossref DOI: 10.55041Crossref DOI: 10.55041
  • SJIF Ranking: 08.659SJIF Ranking: 08.659
  • Licensed under CC BY 4.0Licensed under CC BY 4.0
  • ISO Certification: 9001:2015ISO Certification: 9001:2015
  • Indexed & Cited In: Google ScholarIndexed & Cited In: Google Scholar

Contact Us

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management (IJSREM)

#62/1, New No 7, 1st Cross, 2nd Main, Ganganagar, R T Nagar, Bangalore North, Bangalore, Karnataka, India – 560032
[email protected]+91 93911 67991
logos
logos
Working Hours

Mon – Sat: 9:00 AM – 6:00 PM

Sunday: 10:00 AM – 4:00 PM

+91 93911 67991

© 2026 IJSREM – International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management. This is an open-access journal. Articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
ArticlePeer ReviewedOpen AccessPlagiarism Passed
Paper ID:10.55041/IJSREM.IBFE175

A Comparative Analysis of Linkedin and Traditional Networking in Securing Student Internship and Employment.

Stream/Area:

-

Subject:

-

Paper ID:

10.55041/IJSREM.IBFE175

Volume:

|

|

Pages:

Publication Frequency:

Monthly (12 issues per year)

DOI
Digital Object Identifier
10.55041/IJSREM.IBFE175

License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

Share this article:

Authors

S

Shreya.V.Dhote

D–NG

Dr – N.G. Gupta

Author Services & Downloads

Full Articles

Abstract

In today’s competitive job market, networking plays a crucial role in securing internships and employment opportunities, especially for students and fresh graduates. With the rapid digitalization of recruitment processes, professional networking platforms like LinkedIn have emerged as powerful alternatives to traditional networking methods such as campus placements, personal references, career fairs, and alumni connections. This research paper aims to comparatively analyze the effectiveness of LinkedIn networking and traditional networking in helping students secure internships and employment. The study adopts a descriptive research design using primary data collected through structured questionnaires from students pursuing higher education. The findings indicate that LinkedIn provides wider reach, faster communication, and greater exposure to recruiters, while traditional networking offers trust-based referrals and personalized guidance. The study concludes that a blended approach combining both networking methods yields better career outcomes for students. In today’s competitive job market, students increasingly rely on both digital platforms and conventional methods to secure internships and employment opportunities. LinkedIn has emerged as a dominant professional networking platform, while traditional networking methods such as campus placements, referrals, career fairs, and personal contacts continue to play a significant role. This study aims to comparatively analyze the effectiveness of LinkedIn and traditional networking in securing internships and employment for students. The research is based on primary data collected through a structured questionnaire administered to undergraduate and postgraduate students, along with secondary data from journals, reports, and online sources. Statistical tools such as percentage analysis and hypothesis testing were used for data interpretation. The findings reveal that LinkedIn provides wider exposure, faster communication, and better access to recruiters, whereas traditional networking offers trust-based connections and structured placement opportunities. The study concludes that a hybrid approach combining LinkedIn and traditional networking yields better career outcomes for students. ·

KEYWORDS

LinkedIn Traditional Networking Internships Employment Students Digital Networking.

Cite This Article

Shreya.V.Dhote, Dr – N.G. Gupta, "A Comparative Analysis of Linkedin and Traditional Networking in Securing Student Internship and Employment.," International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management, Jan 2026. https://doi.org/10.55041/IJSREM.IBFE175

Full Article/Conclusion

References

Editorial & Review Transparency

Publication Date

1/28/2026

Peer Review Type

Double-Blind Peer Review

Review Rounds: 2

Documents

Review Report (Confidential)
Copyright Form (Office)

Article Metrics & Impact

Article Views

0

Total views since publication

PDF Downloads

1

Total downloads since publication

Geographic Reach

5

Indexing, Archiving & Preservation

Google Scholar
Academia
ResearchGate
Crossref
SSRN
Semantic Scholar
Thomson Reuters
WorldCat
Mendeley
OpenAlex
EBSCO
Zenodo

Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.

Ethics, Compliance & Transparency

Plagiarism Screening

This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.

Funding Information

No funding information available for this research.

Similar & Recommended Articles

Similar Articles by Topic

Related research in the same subject area

Loading similar articles...