Crossref DOIMemberCiteFactoropen accessissn
SJIF Impact Factor 8.659 | ISSN: 2582-3930
IJSREM Logo

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management

(Gateway to Global Scholars - An International, Scholarly, Multi-Disciplinary, Open Access Journal)

Peer-Reviewed Journal Designed to Meet UGC's Quality Parameters

HomeCurrent IssuePast IssuesPay OnlineConferencesEditorial BoardAbout UsContact Us
IJSREM

Loading article...

Follow Us

  • Google Scholar
  • ResearchGate
  • Academia.edu
  • Mendeley
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Instagram

Journal Policies

  • Peer Review Policy
  • Publication Ethics
  • Copyright Infringement
  • Refund & Cancellation Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Journal Identifiers & Licenses

  • ISSN Verified: 2582-3930ISSN Verified: 2582-3930
  • Crossref DOI: 10.55041Crossref DOI: 10.55041
  • SJIF Ranking: 08.659SJIF Ranking: 08.659
  • Licensed under CC BY 4.0Licensed under CC BY 4.0
  • ISO Certification: 9001:2015ISO Certification: 9001:2015
  • Indexed & Cited In: Google ScholarIndexed & Cited In: Google Scholar

Contact Us

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management (IJSREM)

#62/1, New No 7, 1st Cross, 2nd Main, Ganganagar, R T Nagar, Bangalore North, Bangalore, Karnataka, India – 560032
[email protected]+91 93911 67991
logos
logos
Working Hours

Mon – Sat: 9:00 AM – 6:00 PM

Sunday: 10:00 AM – 4:00 PM

+91 93911 67991

© 2026 IJSREM – International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management. This is an open-access journal. Articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
ArticlePeer ReviewedOpen AccessPlagiarism Passed
Paper ID:IJSREM65717

A Comparative Analysis of Multi-Agent Frameworks for Automated Software Bug Resolution

Stream/Area:

-

Subject:

-

Paper ID:

IJSREM65717

Volume:

10 |

6 |

Jun 2026

Pages:

1-6

Publication Frequency:

Monthly (12 issues per year)

DOI
Digital Object Identifier
Not assigned

License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

Share this article:

Authors

MAZ

Mohammed Akbar Zainool

Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Hyderabad Institute of Technology and Management

Download Author Certificate
MI

Mohammed Imarn

Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Hyderabad Institute of Technology and Management

Download Co-Author Certificate
CS

C. Surekha

Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Hyderabad Institute of Technology and Management

Download Co-Author Certificate

Author Services & Downloads

Full ArticlesAcceptance Certificate

Abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) have significantly transformed software engineering by enabling intelligent code generation, automated testing, documentation, and defect local-ization. While single-agent systems have demonstrated promising performance in software maintenance, they often struggle with complex debugging tasks requiring iterative reasoning, collabora-tive verification, and long execution workflows. Recent advances in multi-agent orchestration frameworks enable multiple spe-cialized agents to cooperate during software debugging, thereby improving reasoning quality, modularity, and maintainability. This paper presents a comparative analysis of five representa-tive multi-agent frameworks—LangGraph, Microsoft AutoGen, CrewAI, OpenAI Agents SDK, and SmolAgents—for automated software bug resolution. A generalized seven-agent debugging architecture is proposed to provide a framework-independent evaluation methodology. The study examines architectural de-sign, workflow orchestration, execution efficiency, scalability, collaboration mechanisms, token utilization, maintainability, and deployment complexity. Mathematical formulations describing collaborative debugging workflows are introduced together with evaluation metrics suitable for benchmarking autonomous soft-ware maintenance systems. Experimental methodology based on publicly available software engineering benchmarks is described, and comparative performance trends are discussed. The pro-posed framework provides researchers and practitioners with a reproducible methodology for evaluating collaborative AI systems designed for intelligent software maintenance while identifying architectural trade-offs among modern multi-agent frameworks.

KEYWORDS

Large Language Models Multi-Agent Systems Software Engineering Automated Program Repair LangGraph AutoGen CrewAI OpenAI Agents SDK

Cite This Article

Mohammed Akbar Zainool, Mohammed Imarn, C. Surekha, "A Comparative Analysis of Multi-Agent Frameworks for Automated Software Bug Resolution," International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 1-6, Jun 2026.

Full Article/Conclusion

This paper presented a comparative evaluation of five con-temporary multi-agent orchestration frameworks for automated software bug resolution. A Unified Multi-Agent Debugging Orchestration (UMADO) architecture was introduced to pro-vide framework-independent benchmarking while ensuring consistent task allocation across different execution environ-ments. The comparative analysis indicates that graph-oriented or-chestration frameworks provide superior workflow control and debugging consistency for complex software systems. Con-versely, lightweight frameworks reduce computational cost and simplify deployment, making them appropriate for educational environments and rapid prototyping. The proposed methodology contributes a reproducible benchmarking framework that enables objective comparison of collaborative AI systems designed for intelligent software maintenance.

References

[1]     A. Vaswani et al., “Attention is all you need,” in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2017. [2]     T. B. Brown et al., “Language models are few-shot learners,” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 33, pp. 1877–1901, 2020. [3]     H. Touvron et al., “Llama 2: Open foundation and fine-tuned chat models,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.09288, 2023. [4]     OpenAI, “Gpt-4 technical report,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.08774, 2023. [5]     J. Yang et al., “Swe-bench: Can language models resolve real-world github issues?” in International Conference on Learning Representa-tions, 2024. [6]     R. Just, D. Jalali, and M. D. Ernst, “Defects4j: A database of existing faults for java programs,” in Proceedings of ISSTA, 2014. [7]     M. Chen et al., “Evaluating large language models trained on code,” in arXiv preprint arXiv:2107.03374, 2021. [8]     R. S. Pressman and B. R. Maxim, Software Engineering: A Practi-tioner’s Approach, 9th ed. McGraw-Hill, 2019. [9]     I. Sommerville, Software Engineering, 10th ed.  Pearson, 2016. [10]    T. H. Cormen et al., Introduction to Algorithms, 4th ed. MIT Press, 2022.

Editorial & Review Transparency

Publication Date

6/30/2026

Peer Review Type

Double-Blind Peer Review

Review Rounds: 2

Documents

Review Report (Confidential)
Copyright Form (Office)

Article Metrics & Impact

Article Views

1

Total views since publication

PDF Downloads

11

Total downloads since publication

Geographic Reach

5

Indexing, Archiving & Preservation

Google Scholar
Academia
ResearchGate
Crossref
SSRN
Semantic Scholar
Thomson Reuters
WorldCat
Mendeley
OpenAlex
EBSCO
Zenodo

Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.

Ethics, Compliance & Transparency

Plagiarism Screening

This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.

Funding Information

No funding information available for this research.

Similar & Recommended Articles

Similar Articles by Topic

Related research in the same subject area

Loading similar articles...