Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM41585
Volume:
9 |
2 |
Feb 2025
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
This study provides a comparative analysis of the risk management strategies and credit management policies of HDFC Bank, India’s largest private sector bank, and State Bank of India (SBI), India’s largest public sector bank. Utilizing both quantitative and qualitative methods, the research evaluates key financial indicators, loan portfolio compositions, and capital adequacy metrics from 2018 to 2023. Key findings reveal that HDFC Bank consistently maintains superior asset quality, with lower Gross and Net NPA ratios compared to SBI, indicative of more effective risk management. HDFC Bank also shows stronger profitability, as evidenced by a higher Return on Assets (ROA) and Capital Adequacy Ratio (CAR), reflecting robust capital reserves and efficient asset utilization. In contrast, SBI’s loan portfolio is more diversified, with significant allocations to corporate and agricultural loans, aligning with its public sector mandate to support various economic sectors. Despite improvements in its financial metrics, SBI faces higher NPA ratios and credit costs compared to HDFC Bank. The study concludes that HDFC Bank’s focused retail banking strategy and stronger financial indicators provide a more effective approach to managing credit risks and maintaining financial health, whereas SBI’s broader mandate and diverse loan portfolio highlight its role in supporting economic and social priorities while facing ongoing challenges.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
2/15/2025
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
4
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...