Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
10.55041/IJSREM57404
Volume:
10 |
3 |
Mar 2026
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
The use of artificial intelligence (AI) in mathematical research is revolutionizing problem-solving approaches. However, the comparison of AI-based math tools with the traditional pen-and-paper problem-solving approach in terms of effectiveness remains underexplored. This study investigates the speed differences between AI-driven tools and the manual pen-and-paper problem-solving method when addressing complex matrix multiplication. Two groups of college students were formed: one group used the AI tool Wolfram Alpha, while the other employed the traditional manual calculation method. A set of benchmark matrix multiplication problems was chosen to assess computational challenges. Quantitative data on the speed of solutions were collected and analyzed. Preliminary findings indicate that AI-assisted methods significantly reduce computation time and excel in handling calculation-heavy tasks. The results suggest that AI’s computational capabilities offer a considerable advantage in terms of speed, showcasing its potential as a faster and more efficient tool for mathematical problem-solving.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
10/2/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
7
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...