Crossref DOIMemberCiteFactoropen accessissn
SJIF Impact Factor 8.659 | ISSN: 2582-3930
IJSREM Logo

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management

(Gateway to Global Scholars - An International, Scholarly, Multi-Disciplinary, Open Access Journal)

Peer-Reviewed Journal Designed to Meet UGC's Quality Parameters

HomeCurrent IssuePast IssuesPay OnlineConferencesEditorial BoardAbout UsContact Us
IJSREM

Loading article...

Follow Us

  • Google Scholar
  • ResearchGate
  • Academia.edu
  • Mendeley
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Instagram

Journal Policies

  • Peer Review Policy
  • Publication Ethics
  • Copyright Infringement
  • Refund & Cancellation Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Journal Identifiers & Licenses

  • ISSN Verified: 2582-3930ISSN Verified: 2582-3930
  • Crossref DOI: 10.55041Crossref DOI: 10.55041
  • SJIF Ranking: 08.659SJIF Ranking: 08.659
  • Licensed under CC BY 4.0Licensed under CC BY 4.0
  • ISO Certification: 9001:2015ISO Certification: 9001:2015
  • Indexed & Cited In: Google ScholarIndexed & Cited In: Google Scholar

Contact Us

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management (IJSREM)

#62/1, New No 7, 1st Cross, 2nd Main, Ganganagar, R T Nagar, Bangalore North, Bangalore, Karnataka, India – 560032
[email protected]+91 93911 67991
logos
logos
Working Hours

Mon – Sat: 9:00 AM – 6:00 PM

Sunday: 10:00 AM – 4:00 PM

+91 93911 67991

© 2026 IJSREM – International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management. This is an open-access journal. Articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
ArticlePeer ReviewedOpen AccessPlagiarism Passed
Paper ID:IJSREM68660

A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE OF ULTRATECH CEMENT LIMITED AND SHREE CEMENT LIMITED

Stream/Area:

-

Subject:

-

Paper ID:

IJSREM68660

Volume:

10 |

10 |

Oct 2026

Pages:

1-6

Publication Frequency:

Monthly (12 issues per year)

DOI
Digital Object Identifier
10.55041/IJSREM68660

License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

Share this article:

Authors

Dr. P. Rajendran

Dr. P. Rajendran

Department of Commerce

Government Arts and Science College, Idappadi,

Download Author Certificate

Author Services & Downloads

Full ArticlesAcceptance Certificate

Abstract

The cement industry plays an important role in India’s infrastructure and economic development. Financial performance in this capital-intensive industry is influenced by production costs, energy prices, transportation expenses, demand conditions, capacity utilisation, financing costs and investment decisions. This study compares the financial performance of UltraTech Cement Limited and Shree Cement Limited over five financial years, from 2021–22 to 2025–26. The analysis uses secondary data reported in the underlying project and examines fifteen financial indicators covering liquidity, profitability, solvency, operational efficiency and shareholder performance. Descriptive measures include mean, standard deviation, coefficient of variation and compound annual growth rate (CAGR). The project also reports Welch’s independent-samples t-tests to assess differences between the companies. The reported results indicate that Shree Cement had stronger average liquidity, gross profit margin, lower debt-equity ratio and higher earnings per share, whereas UltraTech recorded stronger operating profit margin, return on equity, return on capital employed, interest coverage and asset/inventory turnover. Statistically significant differences were reported for current ratio, quick ratio, debt-equity ratio, inventory turnover and earnings per share at the 5% level. The findings suggest that neither company outperformed the other across all dimensions. Since the study is based on a five-year period and two purposively selected companies, the results should be interpreted within these limits. The financial figures, calculation methods and source references should be independently verified against the audited annual reports before journal submission.

KEYWORDS

Financial performance; cement industry; ratio analysis; liquidity; profitability; solvency; UltraTech Cement; Shree Cement; Welch’s t-test

Cite This Article

Dr. P. Rajendran, "A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE OF ULTRATECH CEMENT LIMITED AND SHREE CEMENT LIMITED," International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management, vol. 10, no. 10, pp. 1-6, Oct 2026. https://doi.org/10.55041/IJSREM68660

Full Article/Conclusion

This study compares the reported financial performance of UltraTech Cement Limited and Shree Cement Limited over FY 2021–22 to FY 2025–26 using fifteen financial ratios and descriptive and inferential statistics. The findings indicate different areas of relative strength. Shree Cement recorded stronger average liquidity, gross profit margin, lower debt-equity ratio and higher average EPS. UltraTech recorded stronger operating profit margin, ROE, ROCE, interest coverage, asset turnover and inventory turnover. The project’s reported statistical tests identify differences in current ratio, quick ratio, debt-equity ratio, inventory turnover and EPS, while differences in the other ten ratios were not significant at the 5% level. The overall conclusion is not that one company is universally superior, but that the companies show different financial profiles. UltraTech appears stronger on several operating-efficiency and capital-return measures, while Shree Cement appears stronger on liquidity and lower leverage and reports higher average EPS. These conclusions are provisional until the underlying financial figures, ratio calculations, annual-report sources and statistical tests have been independently verified. A journal submission should include complete references and transparent calculation procedures so that the analysis can be reproduced.

References

Bapodara. (2020). Financial health analysis of selected cement companies using Altman’s Z-score model. [Complete publication details to be verified]. Bhattacharyya. (2025). Financial indicators and profitability of leading Indian cement companies. [Complete publication details to be verified]. ChandraKala. (2019). A study on financial performance of Indian cement companies with reference to selected cement companies. [Complete publication details to be verified]. Chhatoi. (2017). Short-term solvency and operational efficiency of selected cement companies in India. [Complete publication details to be verified]. Choudhury, & Paswan. (2026). Financial performance analysis of selected Indian cement companies using the DuPont model. [Complete publication details to be verified]. De, Bandyopadhyay, & Chakraborty. (2010). Application of factor analysis on the financial ratios of Indian cement industry and validation of the results by cluster analysis. [Complete publication details to be verified]. Dhanunjayulu, & Reddy. (2025). Financial distress analysis of selected Indian cement companies using Altman’s Z-score model. [Complete publication details to be verified]. Gill. (2022). Liquidity and profitability relationship among selected Indian cement companies. [Complete publication details to be verified]. Gopi. (2018). Financial performance analysis of selected cement companies using the Extended DuPont Model. [Complete publication details to be verified]. Jain, & Jain. (2023). Comparative financial performance analysis of ACC and Ambuja Cements. [Complete publication details to be verified]. Khan, M. Y., & Jain, P. K. Financial Management: Text, Problems and Cases. McGraw Hill Education. [Edition/year to be verified]. Khan, & Al-Dalayeen. (2016). Comparative financial performance analysis of selected Indian cement companies. [Complete publication details to be verified].

Editorial & Review Transparency

Publication Date

11/1/2026

Peer Review Type

Double-Blind Peer Review

Review Rounds: 2

Documents

Review Report (Confidential)
Copyright Form (Office)

Article Metrics & Impact

Article Views

0

Total views since publication

PDF Downloads

6

Total downloads since publication

Geographic Reach

5

Indexing, Archiving & Preservation

Google Scholar
Academia
ResearchGate
Crossref
SSRN
Semantic Scholar
Thomson Reuters
WorldCat
Mendeley
OpenAlex
EBSCO
Zenodo

Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.

Ethics, Compliance & Transparency

Plagiarism Screening

This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.

Funding Information

No funding information available for this research.

Similar & Recommended Articles

Similar Articles by Topic

Related research in the same subject area

Loading similar articles...