Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM67022
Volume:
10 |
8 |
Aug 2026
Pages:
1-6
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Department of Computer Science
K. R. T. Art’s, B. H. Commerce and A. M. Science (KTHM) College, Nashik, Maharashtra, India.
Department of Computer Science
K. R. T. Art’s, B. H. Commerce and A. M. Science (KTHM) College, Nashik, Maharashtra, India.
Cloud computing resource management must continuously respond to fluctuating workloads while balancing performance, cost, scalability, service-level agreement (SLA) requirements, and energy consumption. Reactive threshold-based allocation and autoscaling can lead to over-provisioning, under-provisioning, delayed adaptation, and inefficient resource utilization. This paper presents a secondary-data comparative review of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) approaches for predictive workload management, dynamic resource allocation, autoscaling, cost optimization, and energy-efficient cloud operation. Fifteen supplied references were examined; the duplicate entry was consolidated, and reported methods, datasets, objectives, evaluation measures, and quantitative outcomes were compared. The reviewed evidence shows that workload forecasting, deep learning, reinforcement learning, and hybrid AI approaches can improve resource-management decisions, while published results remain difficult to compare because studies use different datasets, simulators, baselines, and metrics. Reported examples include up to 25% operational-cost reduction in a multi-cloud framework, substantial workload-prediction error reductions using neural networks with adaptive differential evolution, and large improvements in makespan, cost, and energy metrics in selected ML resource-allocation studies. The review identifies a major gap: prediction, allocation, autoscaling, cost, and energy objectives are often studied separately or evaluated under inconsistent conditions. A unified, benchmark-driven and multi-objective predictive resource-management framework is therefore proposed as a future research direction.
KEYWORDS
This paper reviewed and compared AI-driven approaches for predictive workload management, dynamic resource allocation, autoscaling, cost optimization, multi-cloud coordination, and energy-efficient cloud operation. The literature consistently indicates that AI and ML can move resource management from reactive provisioning toward proactive decision-making. Workload prediction provides the information needed for anticipation, while reinforcement learning, optimization, and policy-based mechanisms can convert predictions into allocation and scaling actions. The main research gap is the absence of a consistently evaluated, integrated framework that simultaneously considers prediction accuracy, cost, performance, SLA compliance, resource utilization, and energy or carbon impact. Future work should therefore focus on benchmark-driven experiments using common datasets, multiple ML baselines, standardized metrics, multi-objective optimization, online adaptation, and real-world cloud validation. Such a framework can provide stronger evidence for practical deployment of intelligent and sustainable cloud resource management.
[1] A. Adeyinka, “Dynamic resource allocation using AI-driven workload forecasting in multi-cloud environments,” World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 3188–3198, 2024, doi: 10.30574/wjarr.2024.23.1.2178. [2] V. S. Machiraju, V. Kumar, and S. Sharma, “ML-Based Autoscaling for Elastic Cloud Applications: Taxonomy, Frameworks, and Evaluation,” Mathematical and Computational Applications, vol. 31, no. 2, art. 49, 2026, doi: 10.3390/mca31020049. [3] J. Kumar and A. K. Singh, “Workload prediction in cloud using artificial neural network and adaptive differential evolution,” Future Generation Computer Systems, vol. 81, pp. 41–52, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.future.2017.10.047. [4] D. Bodra and S. Khairnar, “Machine learning-based cloud resource allocation algorithms: a comprehensive comparative review,” Frontiers in Computer Science, vol. 7, art. 1678976, 2025, doi: 10.3389/fcomp.2025.1678976. [5] F. Haroon, “Intelligent Resource Allocation in Cloud Computing Environments: Leveraging Machine Learning for Dynamic Workload Balancing, Cost Efficiency, and Performance Optimization,” Annual Methodological Archive Research Review, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 526–549, 2025, doi: 10.63075/gdxsyd86. [6] R. Yadav and J. S. Yadav, “A Comprehensive Review of Machine Learning Approaches for Predictive Resource Management in Cloud Computing Environment,” International Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 347–354, 2025, doi: 10.32628/CSEIT2511656. [7] Thafzy V. M., “A Review on the Integration of Machine Learning in Cloud Computing Resource Management,” International Journal of Scientific Research and Technology, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 18–21, 2025, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.14592545. [8] V. Ramamoorthi, “AI-Driven Resource Management in Cloud Computing: A Review,” International Journal of Scientific Research in Science and Technology, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 683–696, 2024, doi: 10.32628/IJSRST24113260. [9] S. K. Choudhary, “AI-Powered Predictive Analytics for Dynamic Cloud Resource Optimization: A Technical Implementation Framework,” International Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1267–1275, 2025, doi: 10.32628/CSEIT251112122. [10] V. Punniyamoorthy, A. K. Agarwal, B. Kumar, A. Mazumder, K. Kannan, and S. Saha, “AI-Driven Cloud Resource Optimization for Multi-Cluster Environments,” arXiv, 2025, arXiv:2512.24914. [11] O. R. Polu, “AI-Enhanced Cloud Cost Optimization Using Predictive Analytics,” International Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research and Development, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 74–88, 2025, doi: 10.34218/IJAIRD_03_01_006.
Publication Date
8/30/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
2
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...