Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM49019
Volume:
9 |
5 |
May 2025
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
The objective of this study is to investigate and evaluate the brand positioning strategies of Samsung Electronics and Apple Inc., two worldwide technological giants. Although both businesses control a large portion of the smartphone industry, their unique branding strategies have a big impact on market share, customer perception, and brand loyalty. Apple markets itself as a high-end, innovative company that prioritises elegance, simplicity, and a private ecosystem. Samsung, on the other hand, takes a more technologically diversified and inclusive approach, emphasising product diversity, innovative technology, and accessibility for a wider range of customers. The research emphasises how brand values, emotional appeal, price strategy, and communication channels play crucial roles in influencing consumer choices through a comparative analysis based on secondary data, marketing campaigns, customer perception surveys, and market performance. According to the report, Samsung depends on technology leadership and market flexibility, whereas Apple on emotional branding and product experience. Understanding these opposing strategies offers marketers who want to develop successful positioning strategies in dynamic marketplaces important insights into brand management techniques in the competitive technological landscape.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
5/28/2025
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
1
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
12
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...