Crossref DOIMemberCiteFactoropen accessissn
SJIF Impact Factor 8.659 | ISSN: 2582-3930
IJSREM Logo

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management

(Gateway to Global Scholars - An International, Scholarly, Multi-Disciplinary, Open Access Journal)

Peer-Reviewed Journal Designed to Meet UGC's Quality Parameters

HomeCurrent IssuePast IssuesPay OnlineConferencesEditorial BoardAbout UsContact Us
IJSREM

Loading article...

Follow Us

  • Google Scholar
  • ResearchGate
  • Academia.edu
  • Mendeley
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Instagram

Journal Policies

  • Peer Review Policy
  • Publication Ethics
  • Copyright Infringement
  • Refund & Cancellation Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Journal Identifiers & Licenses

  • ISSN Verified: 2582-3930ISSN Verified: 2582-3930
  • Crossref DOI: 10.55041Crossref DOI: 10.55041
  • SJIF Ranking: 08.659SJIF Ranking: 08.659
  • Licensed under CC BY 4.0Licensed under CC BY 4.0
  • ISO Certification: 9001:2015ISO Certification: 9001:2015
  • Indexed & Cited In: Google ScholarIndexed & Cited In: Google Scholar

Contact Us

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management (IJSREM)

#62/1, New No 7, 1st Cross, 2nd Main, Ganganagar, R T Nagar, Bangalore North, Bangalore, Karnataka, India – 560032
[email protected]+91 93911 67991
logos
logos
Working Hours

Mon – Sat: 9:00 AM – 6:00 PM

Sunday: 10:00 AM – 4:00 PM

+91 93911 67991

© 2026 IJSREM – International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management. This is an open-access journal. Articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
ArticlePeer ReviewedOpen AccessPlagiarism Passed
Paper ID:IJSREM63561

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF FOSTER CARE AND INSTITUTIONAL CARE IN CHILD PROTECTION SERVICES

Stream/Area:

-

Subject:

-

Paper ID:

IJSREM63561

Volume:

10 |

5 |

May 2026

Pages:

1-7

Publication Frequency:

Monthly (12 issues per year)

DOI
Digital Object Identifier
10.55041/IJSREM63561

License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

Share this article:

Authors

SP

SANDHYA PANDEY

FIRE TECHNOLOGY & SAFETY ENGINEERING

VIKRANT UNIVERSITY, GWALIOR

Download Author Certificate
DAPS

Dr. Abhishek Pratap Singh

FIRE TECHNOLOGY & SAFETY ENGINEERING

VIKRANT UNIVERSITY, GWALIOR

Download Co-Author Certificate

Author Services & Downloads

Full ArticlesAcceptance Certificate

Abstract

Child protection services play a crucial role in safeguarding vulnerable children who are exposed to abuse, neglect, abandonment, poverty, and social exclusion. Two major alternative care systems widely adopted across the world are foster care and institutional care. This research paper presents a comparative study of foster care and institutional care in terms of psychological development, emotional well-being, education, social adjustment, safety, and long-term rehabilitation of children. The paper highlights international and Indian perspectives, supported by statistical evidence, legal frameworks, and empirical findings. Studies indicate that children raised in family-based foster care generally demonstrate better emotional stability, cognitive development, and social integration compared to children residing in institutional settings. However, foster care systems also face challenges such as placement instability, inadequate monitoring, and shortage of trained foster parents. The paper concludes that while institutional care may provide temporary protection, family-based foster care is comparatively more effective for holistic child development and long-term welfare.

KEYWORDS

Keywords: Child protection foster care institutional care child welfare rehabilitation Juvenile Justice Act child psychology alternative care systems.

Cite This Article

SANDHYA PANDEY, Dr. Abhishek Pratap Singh, "A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF FOSTER CARE AND INSTITUTIONAL CARE IN CHILD PROTECTION SERVICES," International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 1-7, May 2026. https://doi.org/10.55041/IJSREM63561

Full Article/Conclusion

The comparative study demonstrates that foster care is generally more beneficial than institutional care in promoting emotional security, psychological development, and social integration among vulnerable children. Institutional care may provide immediate shelter and protection but often fails to replicate the nurturing environment essential for holistic child development. Modern child welfare systems increasingly recognize that children thrive best in stable family environments. Therefore, governments and child protection agencies should prioritize foster care, kinship care, and family-based rehabilitation models while minimizing unnecessary institutionalization. A balanced child protection framework combining legal safeguards, professional monitoring, mental health services, and community participation is essential for ensuring the rights, dignity, and future well-being of children.  

References

1.        Johnson, R., Browne, K., & Hamilton-Giachritsis, C. (2006). Young Children in Institutional Care at Risk of Harm. Trauma Violence Abuse. 2.        UNICEF. Alternative Care for Children Guidelines. 3.        World Health Organization Reports on Child Development. 4.        Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015, India. 5.        Ismayilova, L., Claypool, E., & Heidorn, E. (2023). Trauma of Separation: The Social and Emotional Impact of Institutionalization on Children. BMC Public Health. 6.        Van IJzendoorn, M. et al. (2011). Children in Institutional Care: Delayed Development and Resilience. 7.        Krishnaswami, U., & Kuttappan, S. (2019). Behavioral and Emotional Problems of Children under Institutional Care in Tamil Nadu. 8.        National Commission for Protection of Child Rights (NCPCR) Reports. 9.        Integrated Child Protection Scheme (ICPS), Government of India. 10.     United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC).  

Editorial & Review Transparency

Publication Date

5/20/2026

Peer Review Type

Double-Blind Peer Review

Review Rounds: 2

Documents

Review Report (Confidential)
Copyright Form (Office)

Article Metrics & Impact

Article Views

0

Total views since publication

PDF Downloads

2

Total downloads since publication

Geographic Reach

5

Indexing, Archiving & Preservation

Google Scholar
Academia
ResearchGate
Crossref
SSRN
Semantic Scholar
Thomson Reuters
WorldCat
Mendeley
OpenAlex
EBSCO
Zenodo

Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.

Ethics, Compliance & Transparency

Plagiarism Screening

This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.

Funding Information

No funding information available for this research.

Similar & Recommended Articles

Similar Articles by Topic

Related research in the same subject area

Loading similar articles...