Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM52105
Volume:
9 |
8 |
Aug 2025
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
The explosive growth of the Internet of Things (IoT) has introduced unprecedented convenience and efficiency into our daily lives and industries. However, this proliferation has also created a massive attack surface, making IoT networks prime targets for a wide range of cyber threats. Traditional security mechanisms, often reliant on static signatures, are ill-equipped to handle the dynamic and sophisticated nature of modern attacks on heterogeneous IoT devices. Machine Learning (ML) has emerged as a powerful paradigm for developing intelligent and adaptive security solutions. This paper presents a comparative study of several prominent machine learning algorithms for detecting cyber attacks in an IoT environment. We evaluate the performance of Logistic Regression, Support Vector Machine (SVM), Decision Tree, Random Forest, XGBoost, and a simple Artificial Neural Network (ANN) on the widely-used Bot-IoT dataset. Our evaluation is based on key performance metrics including accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score. The results demonstrate that ensemble methods, particularly Random Forest and XGBoost, and deep learning models like ANNs, achieve superior performance, with accuracies exceeding 99.9%. This study provides valuable insights into the efficacy of different ML models, aiding researchers and practitioners in selecting appropriate algorithms for robust IoT intrusion detection systems.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
8/25/2025
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
4
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...