Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM50498
Volume:
9 |
6 |
Jun 2025
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
The given research paper contains the results of the comparative analysis of two most popular digital payment systems in India PhonePe and Google Pay in terms of their features, user experience satisfaction, security attitudes, and usability. By analyzing the results of surveys conducted among 60 active users, the paper assesses such areas as the speed of making transactions, the convenience of interfaces, customer service, and reliability to gain insights into the matters affecting consumer choice and loyalty. The results indicate that, although both platforms present secure and stable payment options combined with the Unified Payments Interface (UPI), minor distinctions related to usability, a variety of features, and perceived security build different user experiences. The advantage of the PhonePe is slightly favored by the customers, but it can be explained by the broader range of offered financial services, but Google Pay has advantages of being perfectly integrated with the Google ecosystem and having a convenient design. The issues like the failure of some transactions sometimes and different perception of the security reveal the room of improvement. This study can offer useful findings to developers, policymakers and stakeholders who need to increase mobile payment acceptance and create more secure and user-friendly digital financial environments in India.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
6/14/2025
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
0
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...