Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
10.55041/IJSREM57764
Volume:
10 |
3 |
Mar 2026
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Effective customer retention and service recovery tactics are crucial factors in determining brand success in the fiercely competitive fast-food sector of today. This study looks at and contrasts Burger King’s and McDonald’s customer retention and service recovery techniques. Due to their global operations and fierce competition in comparable market niches, the comparison is pertinent and significant. For the study, a descriptive and quantitative research design was chosen. 50 respondents provided primary data using a standardized questionnaire that was disseminated using Google Forms. Customer happiness, brand loyalty, complaint management efficacy, repeat purchase behavior, and opinion of service quality were all evaluated by the questionnaire. The data was analyzed using graphical depiction, mean score interpretation, and percentage analysis. The results show that Burger King performs competitively in terms of product satisfaction and promotional engagement, but McDonald’s exhibits somewhat more organized service recovery procedures and greater levels of customer retention. Overall, both brands’ customer retention is greatly impacted by efficient service recovery, with compensation, quickness, and transparency being key factors.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
3/16/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
3
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...