Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM67532
Volume:
10 |
9 |
Sep 2026
Pages:
1-5
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Department of Electronics and Computer Science
RTM,Nagpur University,Nagpur
Department of Electronics and Computer Science
RTM,Nagpur University,Nagpur
Background: Schizophrenia has been associated with structural abnormalities of the brain including CSF, GM, and WM. The quantification of brain volume based on T1-weighted MRI together with machine learning will provide more information regarding the abnormalities in order to facilitate classification. Objectives: To investigate the differences in whole-brain CSF, GM, and WM volumes in schizophrenia patients and healthy controls, and to assess the discriminating capabilities of eight different supervised machine learning classifiers based on the volumetric features. Methods: T1-weighted MRI scans from 97 individuals with schizophrenia and 93 healthy controls (total N = 190) were obtained from the OpenNeuro repository. Tissue volumes were extracted using intensity-based K-means segmentation and expressed in milliliters. Group difference were assessed using the Welch's t-test and Mann-Whitney U test. Classification was done on eight algorithms(SVM,RF,XGB,KNN,LR,DT,NB,GB) based on the following performance metrics:accuracy,sensitivity,specificity,F1 score and ROC-AUC. Results: CSF volume was significantly higher in the schizophrenia group (334.61 ± 76.25 mL) than in healthy controls (306.87 ± 87.35 mL; t = −2.329, p = 0.021; Mann–Whitney p = 0.0065), corresponding to a 9.04% increase. Differences in GM and WM volumes were small and not consistently significant. Random Forest obtained the highest classification performance (Accuracy = 0.753, Precision = 0.784, Sensitivity = 0.711, Specificity = 0.796, F1-score = 0.746, ROC-AUC = 0.780). Conclusion: Elevated CSF volume represents the most robust volumetric finding in this cohort. Global tissue volumes provide moderate discriminative information, with Random Forest emerging as the most effective classifier. These results support the utility of structural MRI volumetry as a complementary approach in schizophrenia research.
KEYWORDS
This study reports significant changes in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) volumes in people with schizophrenia and shows that global tissue volumes have sufficient discriminative power. Out of the classifiers that were tested, the one that performed best was the Random Forest classifier, with accuracy of 75.3% and ROC-AUC of 0.780. The study highlights the importance of structural MRI volumetry and also sheds light on the usefulness of ensembles in neuroimaging classification tasks. Future research should focus on employing more sophisticated techniques in segmentation, regional morphometry analysis, and using multiple modality features.
[1] M. R. Arbabshirani, S. Plis, J. Sui, and V. D. Calhoun, “Single subject prediction of brain disorders in neuroimaging: Promises and pitfalls,” NeuroImage, vol. 145, pp. 137–165, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.02.079. [2] M. S. Bagary, M. R. Symms, G. J. Barker, S. H. Mutsatsa, E. M. Joyce, and M. A. Ron, “Gray and white matter brain abnormalities in first-episode schizophrenia inferred from magnetization transfer imaging,” Archives of General Psychiatry, vol. 60, no. 8, pp. 779–788, 2003, doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.60.8.779. [3] V. L. Cropley, P. Klauser, R. K. Lenroot, J. Bruggemann, S. Sundram, C. Bousman, A. Pereira, M. A. Di Biase, T. W. Weickert, C. S. Weickert, C. Pantelis, and A. Zalesky, “Accelerated gray and white matter deterioration with age in schizophrenia,” American Journal of Psychiatry, vol. 174, no. 3, pp. 286–295, 2017, doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2016.16050610. [4] R. De Filippis, E. Carbone, R. Gaetano, A. Bruni, V. Pugliese, C. Segura-Garcia, and P. De Fazio, “Machine learning techniques in a structural and functional MRI diagnostic approach in schizophrenia: A systematic review,” Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, vol. 15, pp. 1605–1627, 2019, doi: 10.2147/NDT.S202418. [5] H. Göker, “1D-convolutional neural network approach and feature extraction methods for automatic detection of schizophrenia,” Signal, Image and Video Processing, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 2627–2636, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s11760-022-02479-7. [6] S. V. Haijma, N. van Haren, W. Cahn, P. C. Koolschijn, H. E. Hulshoff Pol, and R. S. Kahn, “Brain volumes in schizophrenia: A meta-analysis in over 18,000 subjects,” Schizophrenia Bulletin, vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 1129–1138, 2013, doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbs118. [7] D. K. Lee, H. Lee, K. Park, E. Joh, C. E. Kim, and S. Ryu, “Common gray and white matter abnormalities in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder,” PLoS ONE, vol. 15, no. 5, Art. no. e0232826, 2020, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232826. [8] J. Oh, B. L. Oh, K. U. Lee, J. H. Chae, and K. Yun, “Identifying schizophrenia using structural MRI with a deep learning algorithm,” Frontiers in Psychiatry, vol. 11, Art. no. 16, 2020, doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00016. [9] N. N. Raju, “Psychiatry training in India,” Indian Journal of Psychiatry, vol. 64, no. 5, pp. 433–439, 2022, doi: 10.4103/indianjpsychiatry.indianjpsychiatry_649_22. [10] M. E. Shenton, C. C. Dickey, M. Frumin, and R. W. McCarley, “A review of MRI findings in schizophrenia,” Schizophrenia Research, vol. 49, nos. 1–2, pp. 1–52, 2001, doi: 10.1016/S0920-9964(01)00163-3.
Publication Date
9/28/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
5
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...