Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM51453
Volume:
9 |
7 |
Jul 2025
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
The environmental concerns associated with the high carbon footprint of Ordinary Portland Cement (OPC) have intensified research into alternative, sustainable construction materials. Geopolymer concrete (GPC), synthesized from industrial by-products such as fly ash (FA) and ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBS), has emerged as a promising eco-friendly alternative binder system. This review paper provides a comprehensive comparative analysis of FA-based, GGBS-based, and blended FA-GGBS geopolymer concretes, focusing on their mechanical properties, durability, microstructural characteristics, curing conditions, and sustainability. The analysis highlights that while FA-based systems demonstrate superior long-term performance, they often require elevated temperature curing. In contrast, GGBS-based geopolymers provide high early strength and ambient curing capabilities. Blended systems offer a balanced performance profile, combining the advantages of both precursors. Additionally, the review discusses the influence of key parameters such as activator concentration, precursor ratio, curing method, and the use of additives. The findings emphasize the need for mix design optimization and standardized practices to enable the large-scale implementation of geopolymer concrete as a sustainable construction material.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
7/18/2025
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
2
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...