Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
10.55041/IJSREM16373
Volume:
6 |
9 |
Sep 2022
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
In the present study, an attempt has been made to compare physical fitness variables between offensive and defensive soccer players at Rampurhat sub divisional soccer players of West Bengal, India. For this study, different physical fitness variables (Muscular Strength- Hand dynamometer, Muscular Endurance- 1-min. Sit-up Test, flexibility- Sit and reach test, Cardio respiratory endurance- Queen college step test, Speed-50yard dash, Agility-Shuttle run, Leg explosive strength-Standing board jump, and balance- Stork Stand Test) was applied to soccer players to compare their physical fitness performance. Total number of 50 soccer players was selected randomly for this study. The total number of subjects classified as 25 offensive players and rest of 25 was defensive player’s .Their age ranged from 18 to 25 years based on their birth records. The data was computed and analyzed by using descriptive statistics like mean, standard deviation and t-test in order to compare the significant difference between offensive and defensive soccer players. The result reveals that offensive soccer players are comparatively better than defensive soccer players in speed and agility, where as defensive soccer players are superior to offensive soccer players in muscular strength and balance.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
9/16/2022
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
1
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...