Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM16751
Volume:
6 |
11 |
Nov 2022
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
The stock market’s dynamic nature has long attracted both experienced investors and newcomers, offering opportunities for significant gains alongside the risk of rapid losses. Traditionally, market predictions have relied on human expertise, where investors use knowledge, intuition, and awareness of economic and political trends to guide decisions. While effective in many cases, this approach is constrained by emotional bias and limited data-processing capabilities. Recent advances in Artificial Intelligence (AI), particularly in machine learning, have transformed market analysis by enabling the processing of vast datasets and the detection of patterns that may escape human observation. AI models, such as neural networks and decision trees, continuously refine their predictions without fatigue or distraction, providing data-driven insights with speed and precision. This study examines the comparative strengths and weaknesses of AI-driven forecasting and human expert analysis under similar conditions. Rather than seeking to establish superiority, the research aims to explore how human judgment and AI capabilities can work together to enhance accuracy and adaptability in financial forecasting.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
8/28/2025
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
5
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...