A COMPARATIVE STUDY ON THE STRUCTURAL PERFORMANCE AND COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF RED BRICKS AND AAC BLOCKS IN RC BUILDINGS

The construction industry is rapidly evolving, with new innovations and techniques being introduced regularly. With this, it has become imperative to find efficient and cost-effective alternatives to conventional construction materials. One such material is Autoclaved Aerated Concrete (AAC), which can replace conventional red bricks with a more efficient and eco-friendly solution. AAC is a lightweight concrete building material that can be easily cut into masonry blocks or formed into larger planks and panels. Using AAC blocks in construction projects can significantly reduce the overall cost of construction, while also minimizing the production of harmful gases, making it a more sustainable option. This paper aims to analyze, design, and estimate the structural performance and cost of G+3, G+5, G+7, G+9 RC buildings using AAC blocks and conventional red bricks. The software STAAD Pro is used to compare the structural performance and cost of the two building materials. Red clay bricks and AAC blocks are used in walls based on their properties, availability, and cost. A brief comparison between red clay bricks and AAC blocks is presented in this report to help readers make an informed choice. The findings of this study will provide valuable insights to construction professionals and stakeholders looking to adopt more sustainable and cost-effective building materials.