Crossref DOIMemberCiteFactoropen accessissn
SJIF Impact Factor 8.659 | ISSN: 2582-3930
IJSREM Logo

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management

(Gateway to Global Scholars - An International, Scholarly, Multi-Disciplinary, Open Access Journal)

Peer-Reviewed Journal Designed to Meet UGC's Quality Parameters

HomeCurrent IssuePast IssuesPay OnlineConferencesEditorial BoardAbout UsContact Us
IJSREM

Loading article...

Follow Us

  • Google Scholar
  • ResearchGate
  • Academia.edu
  • Mendeley
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Instagram

Journal Policies

  • Peer Review Policy
  • Publication Ethics
  • Copyright Infringement
  • Refund & Cancellation Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Journal Identifiers & Licenses

  • ISSN Verified: 2582-3930ISSN Verified: 2582-3930
  • Crossref DOI: 10.55041Crossref DOI: 10.55041
  • SJIF Ranking: 08.659SJIF Ranking: 08.659
  • Licensed under CC BY 4.0Licensed under CC BY 4.0
  • ISO Certification: 9001:2015ISO Certification: 9001:2015
  • Indexed & Cited In: Google ScholarIndexed & Cited In: Google Scholar

Contact Us

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management (IJSREM)

#62/1, New No 7, 1st Cross, 2nd Main, Ganganagar, R T Nagar, Bangalore North, Bangalore, Karnataka, India – 560032
[email protected]+91 93911 67991
logos
logos
Working Hours

Mon – Sat: 9:00 AM – 6:00 PM

Sunday: 10:00 AM – 4:00 PM

+91 93911 67991

© 2026 IJSREM – International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management. This is an open-access journal. Articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
ArticlePeer ReviewedOpen AccessPlagiarism Passed
Paper ID:10.55041/IJSREM28845

A Comparative Study on Ulips & Mutual Funds

Stream/Area:

-

Subject:

-

Paper ID:

10.55041/IJSREM28845

Volume:

8 |

2 |

Feb 2024

Pages:

Publication Frequency:

Monthly (12 issues per year)

DOI
Digital Object Identifier
10.55041/IJSREM28845

License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

Share this article:

Authors

MFUR

Mr. Fasi Ur Rehman

MKT

Ms. Kommu Tanuja

Author Services & Downloads

Full Articles

Abstract

The study compares the performance of Mutual Funds and ULIPs during periods of high and low market volatility to assess the preparedness of each investment vehicle for economic unpredictability. The paper continues by contrasting the two investment options for liquidity and flexibility, drawing attention to the ease with which investors may manage their portfolios, transfer assets, or renounce plans. Here we take a close look at the expenses associated with mutual funds and ULIPs as well to analyze and compare the risk and returns of selected ULIPs and Mutual Funds to help investors understand how these things affect their overall performance. This research also considers the transparency of these costs, highlighting the need of clear fee structures for investors. In order to better understand the investing landscape and provide prospective customers with the information they need, this study will analyze and contrast two well-known investment vehicles: unit linked insurance plans (ULIPs) and mutual funds (MFs). This study uses quantitative and qualitative methods to evaluate ULIPs and mutual funds across different time periods and market conditions. Two investment vehicles are compared based on their spending ratios, risk-adjusted returns, and performance history. The research also covers the inner workings of both vehicles

KEYWORDS

Cite This Article

Mr. Fasi Ur Rehman, Ms. Kommu Tanuja, "A Comparative Study on Ulips & Mutual Funds," International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management, vol. 8, no. 2, Feb 2024. https://doi.org/10.55041/IJSREM28845

Full Article/Conclusion

References

Editorial & Review Transparency

Publication Date

12/31/45348

Peer Review Type

Double-Blind Peer Review

Review Rounds: 2

Documents

Review Report (Confidential)
Copyright Form (Office)

Article Metrics & Impact

Article Views

0

Total views since publication

PDF Downloads

1

Total downloads since publication

Geographic Reach

5

Indexing, Archiving & Preservation

Google Scholar
Academia
ResearchGate
Crossref
SSRN
Semantic Scholar
Thomson Reuters
WorldCat
Mendeley
OpenAlex
EBSCO
Zenodo

Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.

Ethics, Compliance & Transparency

Plagiarism Screening

This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.

Funding Information

No funding information available for this research.

Similar & Recommended Articles

Similar Articles by Topic

Related research in the same subject area

Loading similar articles...