Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM67512
Volume:
10 |
9 |
Sep 2026
Pages:
1-10
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Information Technology
Prof Ram Meghe College of Engineering and Management Badnera
Information Technology
Prof Ram Meghe College of Engineering and Management Badnera
Information Technology
Prof Ram Meghe College of Engineering and Management Badnera
Information Technology
Prof Ram Meghe College of Engineering and Management Badnera
Information Technology
Prof Ram Meghe College of Engineering and Management Badnera
Information Technology
Prof Ram Meghe College of Engineering and Management Badnera
Literature review is a core task in academic and industry research, but the usual process takes major effort to find relevant papers, screen them, pull out information, compare results, trace citations, combine themes and spot research directions that remain unexplored. Recent progress in artificial intelligence, natural language processing, large language models, retrieval-augmented generation, knowledge graphs and autonomous agent workflows creates a chance to support this process. This paper reviews research related to IRIS (Intelligent Research & Information System), a proposed AI-based research assistant which aims to combine paper retrieval, scientific information extraction, summarization, citation-aware synthesis, knowledge-graph building, research-gap detection and structured report generation.We reviewed eighteen representative papers for five technical areas: AI- assisted systematic literature review (SLR), Scientific natural language processing (NLP), semantic search, RAG, agent reasoning and KN. We observed that existing approaches typically handle individual subproblems well but struggle with integration, provenance detection, long-context processing, explainability, systematic gap detection, etc. With these observations, we propose a conceptual IRIS framework. It consists of several domain-specialized autonomous agents agenting over a citation aware scholarly corpus, and a researchy knowledge graph. we summarize some evidence as to why IRIS is better considered as a human-in-the- loop system rather than a fully automated system of retrieving literature reviews, consistent with common understandings in research.
KEYWORDS
This review has provided a review of research foundations related to. Plus, the IRIS, an Intelligent Research & Information System for assisted literature review. In my experience, important developments in AI-assisted screening. Extraction, scientific NLP, semantic retrieval, RAG, self-reflective generation, agentic workflows, knowledge graphs, and graph-based corpus analysis are highlighted in this literature. Makes sense. Nonetheless, integration, evidence traceability, long-context handling, validation of research gaps, and standard evaluation are significant problems. These limitations have been overcome through the proposed IRIS. Has connected scholarly retrieval, scientific information extraction, evidence-grounded summarization, knowledge graph creation, agentic multi-step analysis, research gap identification. Citation aware report generation. Personally, because of this, rather than any specific novel component, the main. From where I stand, Contributions of the proposed system are its integration process and human-in-the-loop approach. To me, for a final year engineering project, the next step will be to develop. Evaluate a tangible system based on certain clear benchmarks. The way I see it, Then again, as long as the proposed system can highlight accurate retrieval, faithful summary creation, traceable citations, useful thematic relations. No kidding. Verified research gaps suggested, the IRIS will be able to offer an effective platform for literature review.
[1] D. Scherbakov, N. Hubig, V. Jansari, A. Bakumenko, and L. A. Lenert, “The emergence of large language models as tools in literature reviews: A large language model-assisted systematic review,” Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 1071–1086, 2025, doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaf063. [2] S. Agarwal, G. Sahu, A. Puri, I. H. Laradji, K. D. Dvijotham, J. Stanley, L. Charlin, and C. Pal, “LitLLMs, LLMs for Literature Review: Are We There Yet?,” Transactions on Machine Learning Research, 2025. [3] J. L. Lieberum, M. Toews, M.-I. Metzendorf, F. Heilmeyer, W. Siemens, C. Haverkamp, D. Böhringer, J. J. Meerpohl, and A. Eisele-Metzger, “Large language models for conducting systematic reviews: On the rise, but not yet ready for use—a scoping review,” Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, vol. 181, art. 111746, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2025.111746. [4] A. Singh, A. Ehtesham, S. Kumar, T. T. Khoei, and A. V. Vasilakos, “Agentic Retrieval-Augmented Generation: A Survey on Agentic RAG,” arXiv:2501.09136, 2025. [5] S. Guizani, T. Mazhar, T. Shahzad, W. Ahmad, A. Bibi, et al., “A systematic literature review to implement large language model in higher education: Issues and solutions,” Discover Education, vol. 4, art. 35, 2025, doi: 10.1007/s44217-025-00424-7. [6] Y. Saleh, M. Abu Talib, Q. Nasir, and F. Dakalbab, “Evaluating large language models: A systematic review of efficiency, applications, and future directions,” Frontiers in Computer Science, vol. 7, 2025, doi: 10.3389/fcomp.2025.1523699. [7] I. D. Mienye, N. Jere, G. Obaido, O. O. Ogunruku, and E. Esenogho, “Large language models: An overview of foundational architectures, recent trends, and a new taxonomy,” Discover Applied Sciences, vol. 7, art. 1027, 2025, doi: 10.1007/s42452-025-07668-w. [8] F. Bolaños, A. Salatino, F. Osborne, and E. Motta, “Artificial intelligence for literature reviews: Opportunities and challenges,” Artificial Intelligence Review, vol. 57, art. 259, 2024, doi: 10.1007/s10462-024-10902-3. [9] B. Han, T. Susnjak, and A. Mathrani, “Automating systematic literature reviews with retrieval-augmented generation: A comprehensive overview,” Applied Sciences, vol. 14, no. 19, art. 9103, 2024, doi: 10.3390/app14199103. [10] K. Choe, S. Park, S. Jung, H. Kim, J. W. Yang, H. Hong, and J. Seo, “Supporting novice researchers to write literature review using language models,” in Extended Abstracts of CHI 2024, 2024, pp. 1–9, doi: 10.1145/3613905.3650787.
Publication Date
9/26/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
3
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...