Crossref DOIMemberCiteFactoropen accessissn
SJIF Impact Factor 8.659 | ISSN: 2582-3930
IJSREM Logo

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management

(Gateway to Global Scholars - An International, Scholarly, Multi-Disciplinary, Open Access Journal)

Peer-Reviewed Journal Designed to Meet UGC's Quality Parameters

HomeCurrent IssuePast IssuesPay OnlineConferencesEditorial BoardAbout UsContact Us
IJSREM

Loading article...

Follow Us

  • Google Scholar
  • ResearchGate
  • Academia.edu
  • Mendeley
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Instagram

Journal Policies

  • Peer Review Policy
  • Publication Ethics
  • Copyright Infringement
  • Refund & Cancellation Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Journal Identifiers & Licenses

  • ISSN Verified: 2582-3930ISSN Verified: 2582-3930
  • Crossref DOI: 10.55041Crossref DOI: 10.55041
  • SJIF Ranking: 08.659SJIF Ranking: 08.659
  • Licensed under CC BY 4.0Licensed under CC BY 4.0
  • ISO Certification: 9001:2015ISO Certification: 9001:2015
  • Indexed & Cited In: Google ScholarIndexed & Cited In: Google Scholar

Contact Us

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management (IJSREM)

#62/1, New No 7, 1st Cross, 2nd Main, Ganganagar, R T Nagar, Bangalore North, Bangalore, Karnataka, India – 560032
[email protected]+91 93911 67991
logos
logos
Working Hours

Mon – Sat: 9:00 AM – 6:00 PM

Sunday: 10:00 AM – 4:00 PM

+91 93911 67991

© 2026 IJSREM – International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management. This is an open-access journal. Articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
ArticlePeer ReviewedOpen AccessPlagiarism Passed
Paper ID:IJSREM67512

A COMPREHENSIVE REVIEW ON AI DRIVEN LITERATURE RETRIEVAL-AUGMENTED REVIEW, GENERATION, KNOWLEDGE GRAPHS, AND RESEARCH GAP DETECTION

Stream/Area:

-

Subject:

-

Paper ID:

IJSREM67512

Volume:

10 |

9 |

Sep 2026

Pages:

1-10

Publication Frequency:

Monthly (12 issues per year)

DOI
Digital Object Identifier
10.55041/IJSREM67512

License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

Share this article:

Authors

PMSS

Prof Monika S. Shirbhate

Information Technology

Prof Ram Meghe College of Engineering and Management Badnera

Download Author Certificate
PARK

Prof Aparna R. Khairkar

Information Technology

Prof Ram Meghe College of Engineering and Management Badnera

Download Co-Author Certificate
RST

Riya S. Tatode

Information Technology

Prof Ram Meghe College of Engineering and Management Badnera

Download Co-Author Certificate
ASR

Anjali S. Raut

Information Technology

Prof Ram Meghe College of Engineering and Management Badnera

Download Co-Author Certificate
TPB

Trupti P. Bhongle

Information Technology

Prof Ram Meghe College of Engineering and Management Badnera

Download Co-Author Certificate
MAG

Manswi A. Gawande

Information Technology

Prof Ram Meghe College of Engineering and Management Badnera

Download Co-Author Certificate

Author Services & Downloads

Full ArticlesAcceptance Certificate

Abstract

Literature review is a core task in academic and industry research, but the usual process takes major effort to find relevant papers, screen them, pull out information, compare results, trace citations, combine themes and spot research directions that remain unexplored. Recent progress in artificial intelligence, natural language processing, large language models, retrieval-augmented generation, knowledge graphs and autonomous agent workflows creates a chance to support this process. This paper reviews research related to IRIS (Intelligent Research & Information System), a proposed AI-based research assistant which aims to combine paper retrieval, scientific information extraction, summarization, citation-aware synthesis, knowledge-graph building, research-gap detection and structured report generation.We reviewed eighteen representative papers for five technical areas: AI- assisted systematic literature review (SLR), Scientific natural language processing (NLP), semantic search, RAG, agent reasoning and KN. We observed that existing approaches typically handle individual subproblems well but struggle with integration, provenance detection, long-context processing, explainability, systematic gap detection, etc. With these observations, we propose a conceptual IRIS framework. It consists of several domain-specialized autonomous agents agenting over a citation aware scholarly corpus, and a researchy knowledge graph. we summarize some evidence as to why IRIS is better considered as a human-in-the- loop system rather than a fully automated system of retrieving literature reviews, consistent with common understandings in research.

KEYWORDS

IRIS (Intelligent Research & Information System) systematic literature review (SLR) Scientific natural language processing (NLP) semantic search RAG agent reasoning and KN

Cite This Article

Prof Monika S. Shirbhate, Prof Aparna R. Khairkar, Riya S. Tatode, Anjali S. Raut, Trupti P. Bhongle, Manswi A. Gawande, "A COMPREHENSIVE REVIEW ON AI DRIVEN LITERATURE RETRIEVAL-AUGMENTED REVIEW, GENERATION, KNOWLEDGE GRAPHS, AND RESEARCH GAP DETECTION," International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management, vol. 10, no. 9, pp. 1-10, Sep 2026. https://doi.org/10.55041/IJSREM67512

Full Article/Conclusion

This review has provided a review of research foundations related to. Plus, the IRIS, an Intelligent Research & Information System for assisted literature review. In my experience, important developments in AI-assisted screening. Extraction, scientific NLP, semantic retrieval, RAG, self-reflective generation, agentic workflows, knowledge graphs, and graph-based corpus analysis are highlighted in this literature. Makes sense. Nonetheless, integration, evidence traceability, long-context handling, validation of research gaps, and standard evaluation are significant problems. These limitations have been overcome through the proposed IRIS. Has connected scholarly retrieval, scientific information extraction, evidence-grounded summarization, knowledge graph creation, agentic multi-step analysis, research gap identification. Citation aware report generation. Personally, because of this, rather than any specific novel component, the main. From where I stand, Contributions of the proposed system are its integration process and human-in-the-loop approach. To me, for a final year engineering project, the next step will be to develop. Evaluate a tangible system based on certain clear benchmarks. The way I see it, Then again, as long as the proposed system can highlight accurate retrieval, faithful summary creation, traceable citations, useful thematic relations. No kidding. Verified research gaps suggested, the IRIS will be able to offer an effective platform for literature review.

References

[1]  D. Scherbakov, N. Hubig, V. Jansari, A. Bakumenko, and L. A. Lenert, “The emergence of large language models as tools in literature reviews: A large language model-assisted systematic review,” Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 1071–1086, 2025, doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaf063. [2] S. Agarwal, G. Sahu, A. Puri, I. H. Laradji, K. D. Dvijotham, J. Stanley, L. Charlin, and C. Pal, “LitLLMs, LLMs for Literature Review: Are We There Yet?,” Transactions on Machine Learning Research, 2025. [3]  J. L. Lieberum, M. Toews, M.-I. Metzendorf, F. Heilmeyer, W. Siemens, C. Haverkamp, D. Böhringer, J. J. Meerpohl, and A. Eisele-Metzger, “Large language models for conducting systematic reviews: On the rise, but not yet ready for use—a scoping review,” Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, vol. 181, art. 111746, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2025.111746. [4]  A. Singh, A. Ehtesham, S. Kumar, T. T. Khoei, and A. V. Vasilakos, “Agentic Retrieval-Augmented Generation: A Survey on Agentic RAG,” arXiv:2501.09136, 2025. [5]  S. Guizani, T. Mazhar, T. Shahzad, W. Ahmad, A. Bibi, et al., “A systematic literature review to implement large language model in higher education: Issues and solutions,” Discover Education, vol. 4, art. 35, 2025, doi: 10.1007/s44217-025-00424-7. [6]  Y. Saleh, M. Abu Talib, Q. Nasir, and F. Dakalbab, “Evaluating large language models: A systematic review of efficiency, applications, and future directions,” Frontiers in Computer Science, vol. 7, 2025, doi: 10.3389/fcomp.2025.1523699. [7]  I. D. Mienye, N. Jere, G. Obaido, O. O. Ogunruku, and E. Esenogho, “Large language models: An overview of foundational architectures, recent trends, and a new taxonomy,” Discover Applied Sciences, vol. 7, art. 1027, 2025, doi: 10.1007/s42452-025-07668-w. [8]  F. Bolaños, A. Salatino, F. Osborne, and E. Motta, “Artificial intelligence for literature reviews: Opportunities and challenges,” Artificial Intelligence Review, vol. 57, art. 259, 2024, doi: 10.1007/s10462-024-10902-3. [9]  B. Han, T. Susnjak, and A. Mathrani, “Automating systematic literature reviews with retrieval-augmented generation: A comprehensive overview,” Applied Sciences, vol. 14, no. 19, art. 9103, 2024, doi: 10.3390/app14199103. [10] K. Choe, S. Park, S. Jung, H. Kim, J. W. Yang, H. Hong, and J. Seo, “Supporting novice researchers to write literature review using language models,” in Extended Abstracts of CHI 2024, 2024, pp. 1–9, doi: 10.1145/3613905.3650787.

Editorial & Review Transparency

Publication Date

9/26/2026

Peer Review Type

Double-Blind Peer Review

Review Rounds: 2

Documents

Review Report (Confidential)
Copyright Form (Office)

Article Metrics & Impact

Article Views

0

Total views since publication

PDF Downloads

3

Total downloads since publication

Geographic Reach

5

Indexing, Archiving & Preservation

Google Scholar
Academia
ResearchGate
Crossref
SSRN
Semantic Scholar
Thomson Reuters
WorldCat
Mendeley
OpenAlex
EBSCO
Zenodo

Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.

Ethics, Compliance & Transparency

Plagiarism Screening

This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.

Funding Information

No funding information available for this research.

Similar & Recommended Articles

Similar Articles by Topic

Related research in the same subject area

Loading similar articles...