Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREMWP904
Volume:
9 |
5 |
May 2025
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
As machine learning becomes increasingly embedded in real-world applications, the need for reliable, scalable, and maintainable deployment practices has never been greater. Machine Learning Operations (MLOps) has emerged as a key discipline to address this demand, streamlining the end-to-end lifecycle of ML models. With the growing complexity of ML workflows and the shift toward distributed, cloud-based infrastructure, cloud-native MLOps has become a powerful approach. By combining containerization, microservices, and automated orchestration, it enables faster experimentation, robust deployment, and efficient model monitoring. This review explores the landscape of cloud-native MLOps tools and architectures, focusing on widely adopted platforms like MLflow, Kubeflow, Airflow, and DVC. We categorize these tools based on their functionality, flexibility, scalability, and cloud integration. The paper also examines common architectural patterns in modern MLOps pipelines and discusses persistent challenges such as reproducibility, data drift, and system observability. Finally, we look ahead to emerging trends, including serverless MLOps, LLMOps (Large Language Model Operations), and auto-generated pipelines. This work aims to support practitioners and researchers in selecting and designing cloud-native MLOps solutions that align with their technical and organizational needs.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
9/4/2025
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
2
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...