Crossref DOIMemberCiteFactoropen accessissn
SJIF Impact Factor 8.659 | ISSN: 2582-3930
IJSREM Logo

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management

(Gateway to Global Scholars - An International, Scholarly, Multi-Disciplinary, Open Access Journal)

Peer-Reviewed Journal Designed to Meet UGC's Quality Parameters

HomeCurrent IssuePast IssuesPay OnlineConferencesEditorial BoardAbout UsContact Us
IJSREM

Loading article...

Follow Us

  • Google Scholar
  • ResearchGate
  • Academia.edu
  • Mendeley
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Instagram

Journal Policies

  • Peer Review Policy
  • Publication Ethics
  • Copyright Infringement
  • Refund & Cancellation Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Journal Identifiers & Licenses

  • ISSN Verified: 2582-3930ISSN Verified: 2582-3930
  • Crossref DOI: 10.55041Crossref DOI: 10.55041
  • SJIF Ranking: 08.659SJIF Ranking: 08.659
  • Licensed under CC BY 4.0Licensed under CC BY 4.0
  • ISO Certification: 9001:2015ISO Certification: 9001:2015
  • Indexed & Cited In: Google ScholarIndexed & Cited In: Google Scholar

Contact Us

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management (IJSREM)

#62/1, New No 7, 1st Cross, 2nd Main, Ganganagar, R T Nagar, Bangalore North, Bangalore, Karnataka, India – 560032
[email protected]+91 93911 67991
logos
logos
Working Hours

Mon – Sat: 9:00 AM – 6:00 PM

Sunday: 10:00 AM – 4:00 PM

+91 93911 67991

© 2026 IJSREM – International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management. This is an open-access journal. Articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
ArticlePeer ReviewedOpen AccessPlagiarism Passed
Paper ID:IJSREM62735

A COMPREHENSIVE REVIEW ON THE STUDY OF MONOLITHIC BUILDING WITH CONVECTIONAL BUILDING

Stream/Area:

-

Subject:

-

Paper ID:

IJSREM62735

Volume:

10 |

5 |

May 2026

Pages:

1-17

Publication Frequency:

Monthly (12 issues per year)

DOI
Digital Object Identifier
10.55041/IJSREM62735

License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

Share this article:

Authors

LRK

LASHIKA R. KHANDEKAR

CIVIL ENGINEERING

ANJUMAN COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY

Download Author Certificate
ASJ

AISHWARYA S. JIBHAKATE

CIVIL ENGINEERING

ANJUMAN COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY

Download Co-Author Certificate
DRB

DR. RASHMI BADE

CIVIL ENGINEERING

ANJUMAN COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY

Download Co-Author Certificate
DAA

DR. ASHFAQUE ANSARI

CIVIL ENGINEERING

ANJUMAN COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY

Download Co-Author Certificate
SDD

SHREYAL D. DAHIWASE

CIVIL ENGINEERING

ANJUMAN COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY

Download Co-Author Certificate

Mentors

SD

SAGAR DOYE

CIVIL ENGINEERING

ANJUMAN COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY

Download Mentor Certificate

Author Services & Downloads

Full ArticlesAcceptance Certificate

Abstract

This review paper presents a comprehensive and systematic analysis of the design and performance of monolithic structures, with a specific focus on G+7 building of Nagpur, in comparison with traditional framed systems. Monolithic construction involves casting of walls, slabs, and other structural components in a single continuous concrete pour using aluminium formwork, thereby eliminating beam-column joints and enhancing structural continuity. In contrast, conventional RCC framed structures rely on discrete beam-column systems, where load transfer occurs through flexural action, often leading to stress concentration and reduced stiffness under lateral loading. This paper critically reviews 25 research studies to evaluate various aspects such as construction methodology, structural behaviour, load combinations, seismic and wind performance, and overall efficiency of both systems. The study incorporates detailed design considerations based on Indian Standard codes including IS 875 for load calculations and IS 1893 (Part 1):2016 for seismic analysis. A step-by-step analytical methodology using structural analysis software is discussed for modelling and evaluating both monolithic shear wall systems and conventional framed structures. Key parameters such as storey displacement, inter-storey drift, stiffness, torsional resistance, and load distribution are examined under different loading conditions. The findings form the literature indicate that monolithic structures exhibit superior performance in terms of global stiffness, reduced lateral displacement, better load transfer efficiency, improved crack resistance, and enhanced seismic stability. Additionally, the use of aluminium formwork significantly reduced construction time and ensures uniform quality and surface finish. The paper highlights current research trend focusing on seismic behaviour, modular construction techniques, and optimization of construction processes. It also identifies future research opportunities such as the analysis of taller structures (G+15 and above) development of hybrid structural systems combining shear walls and frames, and advanced analytical modelling for performance enhancement.

KEYWORDS

Keywords: Monolithic Structure; Conventional RCC frame; Shear wall; G+7 Building; Seismic Analysis; Load combination; Aluminium formwork; Structural stiffness; Inter-storey drifts; Structural analysis.

Cite This Article

LASHIKA R. KHANDEKAR, AISHWARYA S. JIBHAKATE, DR. RASHMI BADE, DR. ASHFAQUE ANSARI, SHREYAL D. DAHIWASE, SAGAR DOYE, "A COMPREHENSIVE REVIEW ON THE STUDY OF MONOLITHIC BUILDING WITH CONVECTIONAL BUILDING," International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 1-17, May 2026. https://doi.org/10.55041/IJSREM62735

Full Article/Conclusion

The reviewed literature established that monolithic structural systems provide improved seismic resistance, higher stiffness, faster construction cycles compared to conventional RCC framed structures. However, design flexibility and architectural adaptability remain strengths of framed systems. For G+7 buildings in seismic zones, monolithic systems present structural advantages, but final selection should consider economic and functional requirements.

References

[1]             Patel, R., & Shah, M. (2018). Performance evaluation of monolithic concrete construction systems. International Journal of Civil Engineering Research, 9(2), 112–120. [2]              Hibbeler, R. C. (2017). Structural Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Frames. Pearson Education. [3]             Kumar, A., & Singh, V. (2019). Comparative seismic analysis of shear wall and framed structures. International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology, 8(5), 456–462. [4]              Sharma, P., & Jain, N. (2020). Study of lateral displacement in multi-storey buildings. Journal of Structural Engineering, 12(3), 201–210. [5]            Lee, H., & Kim, J. (2016). Structural behaviour of monolithic RC wall systems. Engineering Structures, 124, 85–95. [6]              Wang, Y., et al. (2017). Load transfer efficiency in cast-in-situ monolithic systems. Construction and Building Materials, 140, 145–153. [7]              Zhou, X., & Li, Y. (2018). Incremental dynamic analysis of shear wall buildings. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 110, 312–321. [8]             Gupta, S., & Rao, K. (2019). ETABS model of G+7 shear wall structures. International Journal of Advanced Structural Engineering, 11(1), 33–42. [9]             Mishra, D., & Patel, P. (2021). Torsional behaviour of monolithic residential buildings. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 25(4), 512–529. [10]            Ahmed, S., & Rahman, M. (2017). Crack control in continuous RC construction. Materials Today: Proceedings, 4(9), 9823–9830.

Editorial & Review Transparency

Publication Date

5/6/2026

Peer Review Type

Double-Blind Peer Review

Review Rounds: 2

Documents

Review Report (Confidential)
Copyright Form (Office)

Article Metrics & Impact

Article Views

0

Total views since publication

PDF Downloads

7

Total downloads since publication

Geographic Reach

5

Indexing, Archiving & Preservation

Google Scholar
Academia
ResearchGate
Crossref
SSRN
Semantic Scholar
Thomson Reuters
WorldCat
Mendeley
OpenAlex
EBSCO
Zenodo

Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.

Ethics, Compliance & Transparency

Plagiarism Screening

This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.

Funding Information

No funding information available for this research.

Similar & Recommended Articles

Similar Articles by Topic

Related research in the same subject area

Loading similar articles...