Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM65371
Volume:
10 |
6 |
Jun 2026
Pages:
1-16
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

Master of Business And Administration
MLR institute of Technology
Master of Business And Administration
MLR institute of Technology
Purpose: Fixed assets represent a substantial share of organisational investment and directly shape operational efficiency, cost control, and long-term financial sustainability. This study investigates the fixed asset management practices of Tech Mahindra, a multinational technology services and consulting firm headquartered in Pune, India, with particular attention to how employees perceive the effectiveness of these practices and how that perception relates to productivity, satisfaction, and team dynamics. Design/Methodology: A descriptive research design combining primary and secondary data was adopted. Primary data were collected through a structured questionnaire (ten items) administered to a random sample of 100 employees in Hyderabad, covering demographic profile, perceived productivity impact, satisfaction, conflict reduction, and the perceived drivers of successful or unsuccessful implementation. Secondary data were drawn from Tech Mahindra's annual reports and related corporate documentation. Responses were analysed using descriptive statistics (frequency and percentage distribution) and a one-way ANOVA testing for a significant difference between tangible and intangible fixed assets. Findings: Slightly more than half of respondents (52%) did not perceive current fixed asset management practices as effective in raising productivity, even though 70% attributed observed improvements in employee satisfaction to these practices and 70% of open-ended feedback themes were framed as strengths rather than weaknesses. The most frequently cited drivers of successful implementation were effective communication and collaboration (25%) and leadership support and commitment (20%). The one-way ANOVA returned F ≈ 0 (p = 1.00), indicating no statistically significant difference between the mean scores associated with tangible and intangible fixed assets in the sampled responses. Practical implications: The combination of generally positive qualitative sentiment with a narrow majority reporting no productivity benefit suggests that Tech Mahindra's fixed asset management framework is directionally sound but unevenly experienced across departments, pointing to a need for standardised asset lifecycle management, improved tracking technology, and structured communication. Originality/Value: The study contributes an employee-perception-based, survey-driven perspective to a literature that has historically relied on financial-ratio analysis of fixed asset management, offering a complementary lens for technology-services organisations.
KEYWORDS
This study set out to examine Tech Mahindra's fixed asset management practices across three objectives: the perceived effectiveness of current practices, the relationship between those practices and employee-level outcomes, and a statistical test of tangible versus intangible asset differences with attendant recommendations. The evidence gathered from a 100-respondent employee survey in Hyderabad, supplemented by secondary corporate data, supports a qualified conclusion: Tech Mahindra's fixed asset management framework produces a generally positive impression among employees — most visibly in attributed satisfaction gains and the predominance of strength-framed feedback — but this positive impression coexists with a workforce that remains closely divided on whether the framework delivers a measurable, consistent productivity benefit. The statistical test of tangible versus intangible assets returned no significant difference, suggesting that, from the employee vantage point, asset type is less important than the surrounding managerial process — particularly communication and leadership engagement — in shaping perceived effectiveness. This reframes the practical priority for Tech Mahindra: rather than treating fixed asset management primarily as a technical or accounting exercise, the findings suggest that the human and organisational layer of implementation deserves comparable attention. Proper implementation of the lifecycle-management, technology-investment, and communication-focused recommendations in Section 8 would be expected to narrow the productivity-perception gap and convert the currently favourable but inconsistent employee sentiment into a more uniformly recognised organisational strength.
Armstrong, M. (2000). Performance management: Key strategies and practical guidelines. Kogan Page. Armstrong, M., & Baron, A. (2004). Managing performance: Performance management in action. CIPD Publishing. Bevan, S., & Thompson, M. (1991). Performance management at the crossroads. Personnel Management, 23(11), 36–39. Black, S. E., & Lynch, L. M. (1998). What's driving the new economy? The benefits of workplace innovation. NBER Working Paper. Chakraborty, K. (2017). Working capital and profitability: An empirical analysis of select firms. Indian Journal of Finance. Fletcher, C. (2001). Performance appraisal and management: The developing research agenda. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 74(4), 473–487. Gandhimathi, S., & Ramasamy, T. (2014). A study on financial performance of cement companies in India. International Journal of Management Research. Geetha, E., & Ramasamy, T. (2014). Financial performance analysis of select cement companies in India. International Journal of Innovative Research. Gudimetla, A. (2015). Timing and selectivity in Indian sector mutual funds performance. (Working paper). Gudimetla, A. (2018). Performance and performance persistence of Indian thematic mutual funds. Sumedha Journal of Management, 7(Special Issue), 123–133. Gudimetla, A., & Raghunatha Reddy, D. (2018). Performance of sector-specific mutual fund schemes: Indian evidence. Journal of Advanced Research in Dynamical & Control Systems, 10(08-Special Issue), 136–141. Gungor, P. (2011). The relationship between reward management system and employee performance with the mediating role of motivation. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 24, 1510–1520. Kandula, S. R. (2006). Performance management: Strategies, interventions, drivers. PHI Learning. Lawler, E. E. (2003). Reward practices and performance management system effectiveness. Organizational Dynamics, 32(4), 396–404. Manjula, P., & Sabarinatham, N. (2015). A study on financial performance of cement industry in India. International Journal of Applied Research. Otley, D. (1999). Performance management: A framework for management control systems research. Management Accounting Research, 10(4), 363–382. Selvakumar, M., & Paneerselvam, K. (2014). Financial performance of select IT companies in India: A ratio analysis. Journal of Commerce and Management Thought. Shin, H. H., & Soenen, L. (1998). Efficiency of working capital management and corporate profitability. Financial Practice and Education, 8(2), 37–45.
Publication Date
6/26/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
5
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...