Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM68072
Volume:
10 |
10 |
Oct 2026
Pages:
1-5
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

Department of Mechanical Engineering
Dr. Subhash University

Department of Mechanical Engineering
Dr. Subhash University

Department of Mechanical Engineering
Dr. Subhash University
The transition from conventional high-global-warming-potential (GWP) refrigerants toward environmentally sustainable alternatives has become too essential for reducing the impact on environmental for refrigeration and air-conditioning systems. R134a has been widely used in vapour compression refrigeration (VCRs) systems because of its favourable thermodynamic properties, chemical stability and reliable stable operating system performance. This review paper critically examines the thermodynamic performance, exergy efficiency, environmental sustainability and replacement strategies associated with R134a-based VCR systems. The performance characteristics of potential alternatives, including R600a, R152a, R290, R1234yf, R1234ze(E), R513A and other low GWP refrigerants, are comparatively evaluated. Key parameters such as coefficient of performance (COP) refrigeration capacity, compressor power, mass flow rate, pressure ratio and exergy destruction are systematically discussed. The review further examines the effects of evaporating temperature, condensing temperature, refrigerant charge, superheating, subcooling and system configuration on overall performance. Environmental indicators including GWP, ozone depletion potential (ODP) total equivalent warming impact (TEWI) and life-cycle climate performance (LCCP) are also considered. Particular consideration is given to the trade-off between thermodynamic performance, environmental impact, safety, component compatibility and modify feasibility. The review identifies key research gaps related to standardized experimental comparison, multi-objective optimization and integrated energy–exergy–environmental impact. Finally, future research directions are proposed for developing high efficiency, low GWP, safe and sustainable refrigeration systems as alternatives to R134a.
KEYWORDS
The approach from R134a to low GWP refrigerants is essential for improving the environmental sustainability of vapour compression refrigeration systems. This review shows that alternatives such as R600a, R152a, R290, R1234yf and can provide competitive or improved thermodynamic performance compared with R134a under suitable operating conditions. R600a and R152a are particularly promising for high efficiency refrigerants, while R290 offers excellent thermodynamic performance with very low GWP. Exergy analysis provides additional insight into component wise irreversibility’s and helps identify major sources of performance degradation. The overall suitability of a refrigerant depends not only on COP and cooling capacity but also on GWP, TEWI/LCCP, flammability, safety, compatibility and modification feasibility. Performance-enhancement techniques such as charge optimization, internal heat exchangers, thermodynamic subcooling and advanced optimization methods can further improve system performance. However, variations in system configuration, refrigerant charge, operating conditions and experimental methods make direct comparison among published studies difficult. Future research should therefore integrate energy, exergy, environmental, safety and economic assessments through multi-objective optimization and experimental validation. Overall, the systematic replacement of R134a with suitable low GWP refrigerants can support the development of efficient, environmentally sustainable and reliable next-generation refrigeration systems.
1. M. M. Joybari, M. S. Hatamipour, A. Rahimi and F. Ghadiri Modarres, “Exergy analysis and optimization of R600a as a replacement of R134a in a domestic refrigerator system,” International Journal of Refrigeration, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 1233–1242, 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.ijrefrig.2013.02.012. 2. B. O. Bolaji, “Experimental study of R152a and R32 to replace R134a in a domestic refrigerator,” Energy, vol. 35, no. 9, pp. 3793–3798, 2010, doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2010.05.031. 3. M. Rasti, S. F. Aghamiri and M. S. Hatamipour, “Energy efficiency enhancement of a domestic refrigerator using R436A and R600a as alternative refrigerants to R134a,” International Journal of Thermal Sciences, vol. 74, pp. 86–94, 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2013.07.009. 4. R. Cabello, D. Sánchez, R. Llopis, I. Arauzo and E. Torrella, “Experimental comparison between R152a and R134a working in a refrigeration facility equipped with a hermetic compressor,” International Journal of Refrigeration, vol. 60, pp. 92–105, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.ijrefrig.2015.06.021. 5. D. Sánchez, R. Cabello, R. Llopis, I. Arauzo, J. Catalán-Gil and E. Torrella, “Energy performance evaluation of R1234yf, R1234ze(E) R600a, R290 and R152a as low GWP R134a alternatives,” International Journal of Refrigeration, vol. 74, pp. 269–282, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.ijrefrig.2016.09.020. 6. J. M. Belman-Flores, A. P. Rodríguez-Muñoz, C. Gutiérrez Pérez-Reguera and A. Mota-Babiloni, “Experimental study of R1234yf as a drop-in replacement for R134a in a domestic refrigerator,” International Journal of Refrigeration, vol. 81, pp. 1–11, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.ijrefrig.2017.05.003. 7. J. M. Belman-Flores, V. H. Rangel-Hernández, S. Usón and C. Rubio-Maya, “Energy and exergy analysis of R1234yf as drop-in replacement for R134a in a domestic refrigeration system,” Energy, vol. 132, pp. 116–125, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2017.05.074. 8. A. Maiorino, C. Aprea, M. G. Del Duca, R. Llopis, D. Sánchez and R. Cabello, “R-152a as an alternative refrigerant to R-134a in domestic refrigerators: An experimental analysis,” International Journal of Refrigeration, vol. 96, pp. 106–116, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.ijrefrig.2018.09.020. 9. R. V. Hernández, J. M. Belman-Flores, D. A. Rodríguez-Valderrama, D. Pardo-Cely, A. P. Rodríguez-Muñoz and J. J. Ramírez-Minguela, “Exergoeconomic performance comparison of R1234yf as a drop-in replacement for R134a in a domestic refrigerator,” International Journal of Refrigeration, vol. 100, pp. 113–123, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.ijrefrig.2019.01.016. 10. A. Maiorino, R. Llopis, M. G. Del Duca and C. Aprea, “Environmental impact assessment of R-152a as a drop-in replacement of R-134a in a domestic refrigerator,” International Journal of Refrigeration, vol. 117, pp. 132–139, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.ijrefrig.2020.06.014.
Publication Date
10/17/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
7
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
15
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...