Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM67378
Volume:
10 |
9 |
Sep 2026
Pages:
1-6
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

Computer science
CMR UNIVERSITY
Computer science
CMR UNIVERSITY
Traditional lesson planning methods largely depend on teacher experience and static curriculum guidelines, providing limited insight into how instructional design impacts student academic performance. Existing systems mainly focus on manual evaluation or basic document analysis and fail to semantically interpret pedagogical intent, instructional strategies, and cogni-tive depth within lesson plans. Furthermore, these systems lack predictive capabilities to evaluate the effectiveness of lesson plans before classroom implementation, leading to reactive rather than data-driven instructional improvements. To address these limitations, this project proposes an intelli-gent lesson plan analysis system powered by transformer-based deep learning models. The system automatically extracts and semantically analyses lesson plan content to identify teaching methodologies such as lecture-based, activity-driven, inquiry-oriented, and project-based learning. It further maps lesson content to different levels of Bloom’s Taxonomy and estimates the cognitive load involved in the instructional design. The proposed system correlates lesson plan characteristics with historical student performance data to predict potential academic outcomes before lesson delivery. Additionally, it generates ac-tionable recommendations to improve lesson structure, teach-ing strategies, and learning effectiveness. By integrating deep learning, educational analytics, and predictive modelling, the system enables educators to adopt evidence-based instructional planning, ultimately enhancing teaching quality and student learning outcomes.
KEYWORDS
This paper presented a Deep Learning–Based Educational Intelligence System for lesson plan analysis and teaching strategy enhancement. The proposed framework integrates transformer-based NLP, Bloom’s Taxonomy classification, pre-dictive analytics, and recommendation generation into a uni-fied educational intelligence platform. The system enables educators to evaluate instructional quality, predict academic outcomes, and improve teaching methodologies using data-driven insights. Experimental analy-sis demonstrates the effectiveness of deep learning techniques in educational analytics and instructional planning. The proposed solution contributes toward intelligent edu-cational systems capable of enhancing teaching quality, sup-porting personalized learning, and improving overall student academic performance
[1] Lo´pez-Meneses, E., et al., “Artificial Intelligence in Educational Data Mining, Human-in-the-Loop Machine Learning, and Machine Teaching,” 2025. [2] Gavhane, S., and Pagare, P., “Revolutionizing Academic Evaluation using Deep Neural Networks and BERT-Based Bloom’s Taxonomy Classification,” 2025. [3] Olaniyan, A., et al., “Explainable AI Framework for Automated Lesson Plan Generation and Alignment with Bloom’s Taxonomy,” 2025. [4] Alammary, A., and Masoud, M., “Bayesian-Optimized Ensemble Model for Bloom’s Taxonomy Classification using DistilBERT and TF-IDF,” 2025. [5] Liu, X., “Integration of Generative Artificial Intelligence with Student Learning Contexts: Opportunities and Challenges,” 2025. [6] Almatrafi, M., “Leveraging Generative Artificial Intelligence for Course Learning Outcome Classification,” 2025. [7] Herrmann-Werner, A., et al., “Evaluation of GPT-4 Cognitive Capabili-ties using Bloom’s Taxonomy in Educational Assessment,” 2024. [8] Giannakos, M., “The Promise and Challenges of Generative AI in Education,” 2024. [9] Zhang, Y., “The Multidimensional Impact of Artificial Intelligence in Education,” 2025. [10] Kadam, P., et al., “AI-Based Personalized Learning System using Ma-chine Learning and Retrieval-Augmented Generation,” 2025.
Publication Date
9/21/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
2
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...