Crossref DOIMemberCiteFactoropen accessissn
SJIF Impact Factor 8.659 | ISSN: 2582-3930
IJSREM Logo

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management

(Gateway to Global Scholars - An International, Scholarly, Multi-Disciplinary, Open Access Journal)

Peer-Reviewed Journal Designed to Meet UGC's Quality Parameters

HomeCurrent IssuePast IssuesPay OnlineConferencesEditorial BoardAbout UsContact Us
IJSREM

Loading article...

Follow Us

  • Google Scholar
  • ResearchGate
  • Academia.edu
  • Mendeley
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Instagram

Journal Policies

  • Peer Review Policy
  • Publication Ethics
  • Copyright Infringement
  • Refund & Cancellation Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Journal Identifiers & Licenses

  • ISSN Verified: 2582-3930ISSN Verified: 2582-3930
  • Crossref DOI: 10.55041Crossref DOI: 10.55041
  • SJIF Ranking: 08.659SJIF Ranking: 08.659
  • Licensed under CC BY 4.0Licensed under CC BY 4.0
  • ISO Certification: 9001:2015ISO Certification: 9001:2015
  • Indexed & Cited In: Google ScholarIndexed & Cited In: Google Scholar

Contact Us

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management (IJSREM)

#62/1, New No 7, 1st Cross, 2nd Main, Ganganagar, R T Nagar, Bangalore North, Bangalore, Karnataka, India – 560032
[email protected]+91 93911 67991
logos
logos
Working Hours

Mon – Sat: 9:00 AM – 6:00 PM

Sunday: 10:00 AM – 4:00 PM

+91 93911 67991

© 2026 IJSREM – International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management. This is an open-access journal. Articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
ArticlePeer ReviewedOpen AccessPlagiarism Passed
Paper ID:IJSREM67102

A Fairness-Aware Multi-Objective Recommendation Framework for Mitigating Creator Popularity Bias and Balancing User Utility and Engagement

Stream/Area:

-

Subject:

-

Paper ID:

IJSREM67102

Volume:

10 |

9 |

Sep 2026

Pages:

1-8

Publication Frequency:

Monthly (12 issues per year)

DOI
Digital Object Identifier
10.55041/IJSREM67102

License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

Share this article:

Authors

AS

A. Srinivasan

Intelligent Systems and Data Science

KPR College of Arts Science and Research, Coimbatore

Download Author Certificate

Mentors

DGS

Dr. G. Satyavathy

Professor & Head, Department of Computer Science with Data Analytics,

KPR College of Arts Science and Research, Coimbatore

Download Mentor Certificate

Author Services & Downloads

Full ArticlesAcceptance Certificate

Abstract

Recommendation systems have become a central mechanism for organizing digital content, products, creators, and services. Although conventional recommender models are commonly optimized for accuracy and short-term engagement, their ranking behavior can systematically favor already popular creators and reduce the visibility of less-established creators. This review examines the emerging research problem of creator popularity bias from a multi-objective perspective, where user utility, engagement, creator fairness, exposure diversity, and platform sustainability must be considered simultaneously. The paper synthesizes major recommendation paradigms, fairness definitions, popularity-bias mechanisms, exposure-based evaluation, multi-objective optimization, re-ranking, learning-to-rank, and reinforcement-learning approaches. Based on the reviewed literature, a conceptual framework named Fairness-Aware Multi-Objective Recommendation (FAMOR) is proposed. The framework combines personalized relevance with creator exposure constraints and engagement-aware utility optimization. It uses creator-level fairness indicators, popularity-adjusted exposure, diversity measures, and user satisfaction as complementary objectives rather than treating fairness as a post-processing add-on. The review identifies important challenges involving fairness definitions, cold-start creators, feedback loops, dynamic preferences, creator heterogeneity, computational cost, and the risk of reducing perceived recommendation quality. Future research should investigate context-sensitive fairness, causal exposure modeling, long-term creator welfare, explainability, and online adaptive optimization. The proposed framework provides a structured foundation for designing recommender systems that preserve useful personalization while promoting more equitable opportunities for creators.

KEYWORDS

recommender systems; creator fairness; popularity bias; multi-objective optimization; user utility; engagement; exposure fairness; learning-to-rank; recommendation diversity; responsible AI

Cite This Article

A. Srinivasan, Dr. G. Satyavathy, "A Fairness-Aware Multi-Objective Recommendation Framework for Mitigating Creator Popularity Bias and Balancing User Utility and Engagement," International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management, vol. 10, no. 9, pp. 1-8, Sep 2026. https://doi.org/10.55041/IJSREM67102

Full Article/Conclusion

Recommendation systems increasingly function as attention-allocation mechanisms, making creator exposure an important algorithmic outcome. Popularity bias can emerge through feedback loops in which historical visibility produces interactions, interactions influence ranking, and ranking produces additional visibility. Optimizing only for immediate engagement can therefore amplify concentration and reduce opportunities for emerging or long-tail creators. This review argues for a multi-objective approach in which relevance and engagement remain essential but are balanced with user utility, diversity, novelty, and creator fairness. The proposed Fairness-Aware Multi-Objective Recommendation (FAMOR) framework integrates popularity-aware scoring, exposure-aware ranking, cold-start exploration, multi-objective optimization, and continuous monitoring. The framework does not assume that all creators should receive identical exposure; instead, it emphasizes fair opportunity subject to relevance, quality, and user context. Future empirical studies should test the framework using realistic exposure logs and online experiments, with particular attention to causal effects and long-term ecosystem outcomes. Such research can help move recommender systems from purely engagement-centered optimization toward responsible personalization that benefits users, creators, and platforms simultaneously.

References

Abdollahpouri, H., Burke, R., & Mobasher, B. (2017). Controlling popularity bias in learning-to-rank recommendation. Proceedings of the 11th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems. Abdollahpouri, H., Burke, R., & Mobasher, B. (2019). Managing popularity bias in recommender systems with personalized re-ranking. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Burke, R. (2017). Multisided fairness for recommendation. FATREC Workshop on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency in Recommender Systems. Ekstrand, M. D., Burke, R., & Diaz, F. (2018). Fairness and discrimination in recommendation and retrieval. Proceedings of the 11th ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining. Fabbri, F., Bonchi, F., Boratto, L., & Castillo, C. (2021). Exposure inequality in recommender systems: A review and research agenda. ACM Computing Surveys. Ge, Y., Liu, S., Fu, Z., Tan, J., Li, Z., & others. (2021). Towards long-term fairness in recommendation. Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management. Hardt, M., Price, E., & Srebro, N. (2016). Equality of opportunity in supervised learning. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. Joachims, T., Swaminathan, A., & Schnabel, T. (2017). Unbiased learning-to-rank with biased feedback. Proceedings of the 10th ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining. Jannach, D., Zanker, M., Felfernig, A., & Friedrich, G. (2010). Recommender Systems: An Introduction. Cambridge University Press. Kunaver, M., & Požrl, T. (2017). Diversity in recommender systems: A survey. Knowledge-Based Systems, 123, 154–162.

Editorial & Review Transparency

Publication Date

9/7/2026

Peer Review Type

Double-Blind Peer Review

Review Rounds: 2

Documents

Review Report (Confidential)
Copyright Form (Office)

Article Metrics & Impact

Article Views

2

Total views since publication

PDF Downloads

9

Total downloads since publication

Geographic Reach

5

Indexing, Archiving & Preservation

Google Scholar
Academia
ResearchGate
Crossref
SSRN
Semantic Scholar
Thomson Reuters
WorldCat
Mendeley
OpenAlex
EBSCO
Zenodo

Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.

Ethics, Compliance & Transparency

Plagiarism Screening

This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.

Funding Information

No funding information available for this research.

Similar & Recommended Articles

Similar Articles by Topic

Related research in the same subject area

Loading similar articles...