Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM67102
Volume:
10 |
9 |
Sep 2026
Pages:
1-8
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Intelligent Systems and Data Science
KPR College of Arts Science and Research, Coimbatore
Professor & Head, Department of Computer Science with Data Analytics,
KPR College of Arts Science and Research, Coimbatore
Recommendation systems have become a central mechanism for organizing digital content, products, creators, and services. Although conventional recommender models are commonly optimized for accuracy and short-term engagement, their ranking behavior can systematically favor already popular creators and reduce the visibility of less-established creators. This review examines the emerging research problem of creator popularity bias from a multi-objective perspective, where user utility, engagement, creator fairness, exposure diversity, and platform sustainability must be considered simultaneously. The paper synthesizes major recommendation paradigms, fairness definitions, popularity-bias mechanisms, exposure-based evaluation, multi-objective optimization, re-ranking, learning-to-rank, and reinforcement-learning approaches. Based on the reviewed literature, a conceptual framework named Fairness-Aware Multi-Objective Recommendation (FAMOR) is proposed. The framework combines personalized relevance with creator exposure constraints and engagement-aware utility optimization. It uses creator-level fairness indicators, popularity-adjusted exposure, diversity measures, and user satisfaction as complementary objectives rather than treating fairness as a post-processing add-on. The review identifies important challenges involving fairness definitions, cold-start creators, feedback loops, dynamic preferences, creator heterogeneity, computational cost, and the risk of reducing perceived recommendation quality. Future research should investigate context-sensitive fairness, causal exposure modeling, long-term creator welfare, explainability, and online adaptive optimization. The proposed framework provides a structured foundation for designing recommender systems that preserve useful personalization while promoting more equitable opportunities for creators.
KEYWORDS
Recommendation systems increasingly function as attention-allocation mechanisms, making creator exposure an important algorithmic outcome. Popularity bias can emerge through feedback loops in which historical visibility produces interactions, interactions influence ranking, and ranking produces additional visibility. Optimizing only for immediate engagement can therefore amplify concentration and reduce opportunities for emerging or long-tail creators. This review argues for a multi-objective approach in which relevance and engagement remain essential but are balanced with user utility, diversity, novelty, and creator fairness. The proposed Fairness-Aware Multi-Objective Recommendation (FAMOR) framework integrates popularity-aware scoring, exposure-aware ranking, cold-start exploration, multi-objective optimization, and continuous monitoring. The framework does not assume that all creators should receive identical exposure; instead, it emphasizes fair opportunity subject to relevance, quality, and user context. Future empirical studies should test the framework using realistic exposure logs and online experiments, with particular attention to causal effects and long-term ecosystem outcomes. Such research can help move recommender systems from purely engagement-centered optimization toward responsible personalization that benefits users, creators, and platforms simultaneously.
Abdollahpouri, H., Burke, R., & Mobasher, B. (2017). Controlling popularity bias in learning-to-rank recommendation. Proceedings of the 11th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems. Abdollahpouri, H., Burke, R., & Mobasher, B. (2019). Managing popularity bias in recommender systems with personalized re-ranking. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Burke, R. (2017). Multisided fairness for recommendation. FATREC Workshop on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency in Recommender Systems. Ekstrand, M. D., Burke, R., & Diaz, F. (2018). Fairness and discrimination in recommendation and retrieval. Proceedings of the 11th ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining. Fabbri, F., Bonchi, F., Boratto, L., & Castillo, C. (2021). Exposure inequality in recommender systems: A review and research agenda. ACM Computing Surveys. Ge, Y., Liu, S., Fu, Z., Tan, J., Li, Z., & others. (2021). Towards long-term fairness in recommendation. Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management. Hardt, M., Price, E., & Srebro, N. (2016). Equality of opportunity in supervised learning. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. Joachims, T., Swaminathan, A., & Schnabel, T. (2017). Unbiased learning-to-rank with biased feedback. Proceedings of the 10th ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining. Jannach, D., Zanker, M., Felfernig, A., & Friedrich, G. (2010). Recommender Systems: An Introduction. Cambridge University Press. Kunaver, M., & Požrl, T. (2017). Diversity in recommender systems: A survey. Knowledge-Based Systems, 123, 154–162.
Publication Date
9/7/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
2
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
9
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...