Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM68681
Volume:
10 |
11 |
Nov 2026
Pages:
1-15
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

Computer Engineering
sandip institute of technology and research center nashik

Computer Engineering
sandip institute of technology and research center nashik

Computer Engineering
sandip institute of technology and research center nashik

Computer Engineering
sandip institute of technology and research center nashik

Computer Engineering
sandip institute of technology and research center nashik
Cryptocurrency networks give criminals a fast, borderless and pseudonymous way to launder money, yet the public ledgers that make this possible also produce transaction graphs far too large and too fast-moving for manual or rule-based review. Graph neural networks (GNNs) have become the leading modelling approach for this problem because they work directly on the account-transaction graph and not on flattened, per-transaction feature vectors. This paper reviews the recent literature on GNN-based blockchain anti-money laundering (AML) and organizes eighteen studies into five threads: foundational models built on the Elliptic benchmark, attention-based and heterogeneous architectures, temporal and ensemble methods, explainability and privacy-preserving techniques, and early system-level platforms for real-time use. A comparative analysis and a six-point gap analysis show that few studies deal with end-to-end platforms that combine incremental graph maintenance, low-latency inference and investigator-facing explanation. To fill this gap, the paper proposes ChainSentry-GNN, a six-layer reference architecture covering ledger ingestion, incremental graph construction, model serving, explainability, adaptive thresholding and an analyst feedback loop, together with an evaluation methodology centred on detection quality, latency, throughput and cross-chain generalization.
KEYWORDS
This paper reviewed eighteen studies on graph neural networks for blockchain anti-money laundering, spanning foundational Elliptic-benchmark models, attention-based and heterogeneous architectures, temporal and ensemble methods, explainability and privacy-preserving techniques, and early real-time system designs. The analysis shows that GNNs have become the dominant and consistently effective way to capture coordinated on-chain laundering behaviour. It also shows that the field has concentrated heavily on offline detection accuracy over a single blockchain and a single historical period, with comparatively little attention to incremental graph maintenance, inference latency, cross-chain generalization and architecture-native, investigator-facing explanation. To address these gaps, the proposed ChainSentry-GNN architecture combines chain-agnostic ledger ingestion, incremental graph updating, directed heterogeneous graph-attention scoring (Eqs. 5–7), reinforcement-learning-driven adaptive thresholding (Eqs. 9–10), typology-aligned explanation and a closed feedback loop with human investigators in a single platform design. By treating update latency, throughput and explanation fidelity as first-class evaluation criteria alongside detection accuracy, the proposed direction aims to help move blockchain AML research from static, benchmark-optimized models toward deployable, auditable monitoring platforms.
[1] M. Weber, G. Domeniconi, J. Chen, D. K. I. Weidele, C. Bellei, T. Robinson, and C. E. Leiserson, “Anti-Money Laundering in Bitcoin: Experimenting with Graph Convolutional Networks for Financial Forensics,” in Proc. KDD Workshop on Anomaly Detection in Finance, 2019. [2] C. Bellei, M. Xu, R. Phillips, T. Robinson, M. Weber, T. Kaler, C. E. Leiserson, Arvind, and J. Chen, “The Shape of Money Laundering: Subgraph Representation Learning on the Blockchain with the Elliptic2 Dataset,” in Proc. KDD Workshop on Machine Learning in Finance, 2024, arXiv:2404.19109. [3] I. Alarab, S. Prakoonwit, and M. I. Nacer, “Competence of Graph Convolutional Networks for Anti-Money Laundering in Bitcoin Blockchain,” in Proc. 5th Int. Conf. Machine Learning Technologies (ICMLT), Beijing, China, 2020, pp. 23–27. [4] I. Alarab and S. Prakoonwit, “Graph-Based LSTM for Anti-Money Laundering: Experimenting Temporal Graph Convolutional Network with Bitcoin Data,” Neural Process. Lett., vol. 54, pp. 1–19, 2022. [5] W. W. Lo, M. Sarhan, S. Layeghy, and M. Portmann, “Inspection-L: A Self-Supervised GNN-Based Money Laundering Detection System for Bitcoin,” arXiv:2203.10465, 2022. [6] D. Cheng, Y. Ye, S. Xiang, Z. Ma, Y. Zhang, and C. Jiang, “Anti-Money Laundering by Group-Aware Deep Graph Learning,” IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng., vol. 35, no. 12, pp. 12444–12457, 2023. [7] X. Li, Y. Li, X. Mo, H. Xiao, Y. Shen, and L. Chen, “DIGA: Guided Diffusion Model for Graph Recovery in Anti-Money Laundering,” in Proc. 29th ACM SIGKDD Conf. Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 2023, pp. 4404–4413. [8] O. M. Olaniyi, I. S. Aroh, O. Henry, O. C. Metibemu, and O. I. Akinola, “Graph Neural Networks for Multi-Layered Financial Crime Network Detection: An Explainable AI Framework for Anti-Money Laundering,” J. Eng. Res. Rep., vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 18–36, 2026. [9] C.-H. Poon, J. Kwok, C. Chow, and J.-H. Choi, “LineMVGNN: Anti-Money Laundering with Line-Graph-Assisted Multi-View Graph Neural Networks,” AI, vol. 6, no. 4, art. 69, 2025. [10] F. Johannessen and M. Jullum, “Finding Money Launderers Using Heterogeneous Graph Neural Networks,” arXiv:2307.13499, 2023.
Publication Date
11/2/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
5
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
9
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...