Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM59348
Volume:
10 |
4 |
April 2026
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
In preventive health care and better patient outcomes, early and correct health risk assessment is of primary importance. Traditional machine learning tools are not always useful in capturing spatial and temporal relationships on complex medical data. The article is a review and discussion of hybrid deep learning models that comprise convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and recurrent models (Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM)). We explore 30 state-of-the-art papers that include cardiovascular disease diagnosis, diabetes diagnosis, respiratory disease diagnosis and multi-disease risk diagnosis at a systematic level. Our analysis reveals that hybrid CNN-LSTM models are always more effective, with accuracy rates of 92.5 to 98.26 with the can-reach of up to 0.98 in all types of healthcare contexts. The principal architectural trends, benchmarks, commonly utilized datasets, and the gaps in the research that most address the gaps that we are interested in identifying are the real-world generalizability, interpretability, cross-domain robustness. This work provides a convenient starting point to scientists and medical personnel who have to innovate in the next generation of health risk assessment system.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
7/3/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
0
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...