Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
10.55041/IJSREM56071
Volume:
10 |
1 |
Jan 2026
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
The rapid growth of social media platforms has significantly increased the spread of fake news, creating serious challenges for information credibility and public trust. Automated fake news detection has therefore become an important research area in data science and management studies. This paper presents a hybrid machine learning and deep learning framework for fake news detection using sentiment analysis and textual features. Traditional machine learning classifiers such as Naïve Bayes and Logistic Regression are combined with deep learning models including Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN), Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), and Bidirectional LSTM (Bi-LSTM). Sentiment polarity is extracted using the VADER sentiment lexicon, while TF-IDF and word embedding techniques are employed for feature representation. Experimental evaluation is conducted on a Twitter-based fake news dataset obtained from Kaggle. The results show that Logistic Regression achieved an accuracy of 91.16%, while the proposed CNN–BiLSTM hybrid model achieved a testing accuracy of 89.94%, demonstrating improved robustness in identifying fake news. The findings indicate that integrating sentiment features with deep learning architectures provides an effective solution for combating misinformation on social media platforms.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
1/16/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
4
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...