Crossref DOIMemberCiteFactoropen accessissn
SJIF Impact Factor 8.659 | ISSN: 2582-3930
IJSREM Logo

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management

(Gateway to Global Scholars - An International, Scholarly, Multi-Disciplinary, Open Access Journal)

Peer-Reviewed Journal Designed to Meet UGC's Quality Parameters

HomeCurrent IssuePast IssuesPay OnlineConferencesEditorial BoardAbout UsContact Us
IJSREM

Loading article...

Follow Us

  • Google Scholar
  • ResearchGate
  • Academia.edu
  • Mendeley
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Instagram

Journal Policies

  • Peer Review Policy
  • Publication Ethics
  • Copyright Infringement
  • Refund & Cancellation Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Journal Identifiers & Licenses

  • ISSN Verified: 2582-3930ISSN Verified: 2582-3930
  • Crossref DOI: 10.55041Crossref DOI: 10.55041
  • SJIF Ranking: 08.659SJIF Ranking: 08.659
  • Licensed under CC BY 4.0Licensed under CC BY 4.0
  • ISO Certification: 9001:2015ISO Certification: 9001:2015
  • Indexed & Cited In: Google ScholarIndexed & Cited In: Google Scholar

Contact Us

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management (IJSREM)

#62/1, New No 7, 1st Cross, 2nd Main, Ganganagar, R T Nagar, Bangalore North, Bangalore, Karnataka, India – 560032
[email protected]+91 93911 67991
logos
logos
Working Hours

Mon – Sat: 9:00 AM – 6:00 PM

Sunday: 10:00 AM – 4:00 PM

+91 93911 67991

© 2026 IJSREM – International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management. This is an open-access journal. Articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
ArticlePeer ReviewedOpen AccessPlagiarism Passed
Paper ID:IJSREM62693

A Hybrid Machine Learning Framework for Poultry Disease Prediction and Sustainable Organic Control in Precision Poultry Farming

Stream/Area:

-

Subject:

-

Paper ID:

IJSREM62693

Volume:

10 |

5 |

May 2026

Pages:

1-7

Publication Frequency:

Monthly (12 issues per year)

DOI
Digital Object Identifier
10.55041/IJSREM62693

License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

Share this article:

Authors

WK

Wasiu K.O

Department of Computer Technology

Yaba College of Technology, Computer Tech. Dept., Yaba, Lagos Nigeria

Download Author Certificate
AA

Akinsola Adeniyi.F.

Department of Computer Technology

Yaba College of Technology, Computer Tech. Dept., Yaba, Lagos Nigeria

Download Co-Author Certificate
S

Sokunbi.M.A

Department of Computer Technology

Yaba College of Technology, Computer Tech. Dept., Yaba, Lagos Nigeria

Download Co-Author Certificate
O

Ogundele.I.O,

Department of Computer Technology

Yaba College of Technology, Computer Tech. Dept., Yaba, Lagos Nigeria

Download Co-Author Certificate
OI

Onadokun I.O.

Department of Computer Technology

Yaba College of Technology, Computer Tech. Dept., Yaba, Lagos Nigeria

Download Co-Author Certificate

Author Services & Downloads

Full ArticlesAcceptance Certificate

Abstract

Poultry is a vital component of both the world's food supply and agricultural-based economy, especially in developing nations. In many developing nations, poultry is an important source of affordable protein and income for families; however, poultry continues to be challenged by infectious disease agents (e.g., Newcastle Disease, Avian Influenza, Coccidiosis, Salmonellosis). The early detection of these infectious agents and the use of preventative measures are critical to limiting mortality rates, economic loss and reliance on antibiotics. This research presents an integrated machine learning model to predict poultry diseases based on a combination of the environmental and managerial parameters in conjunction with organic methods of disease control. The four machine learning classifiers — Random Forest, Decision Trees, Naive Bayes, and K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN) — were tested and compared using a dataset from a poultry farm that included some factors such as temperature, humidity, litter moisture, bird density, feed quality, and whether or not birds had been vaccinated. Performance metrics for each model are presented through accuracy, precision, recall, F1 score and AUC scores. The experimental findings indicate that a random forest model produced the best predictive accuracy with 94% and a best AUC score of .96. The feature importance indicated that the top predictor for poultry disease were the temperature, humidity, vaccination status and litter moisture. In addition, the proposed sustainable poultry farming system will use predictive modeling to make recommendations for treating poultry disease organically and reduce the need for antibiotics in poultry production. Results show that using sustainable agriculture methods combined with machine learning (ML) techniques can greatly increase the accuracy of poultry disease detection and poultry farm decision-making. This method can be added to existing precision livestock farming systems as well as to mobile decision support tools to allow for real-time monitoring of poultry health.

KEYWORDS

Keywords: Poultry Disease Prediction Machine Learning Random Forest Precision Livestock Farming Sustainable Agriculture Organic Disease Control

Cite This Article

Wasiu K.O, Akinsola Adeniyi.F., Sokunbi.M.A, Ogundele.I.O, Onadokun I.O., "A Hybrid Machine Learning Framework for Poultry Disease Prediction and Sustainable Organic Control in Precision Poultry Farming," International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 1-7, May 2026. https://doi.org/10.55041/IJSREM62693

Full Article/Conclusion

The researchers created a hybrid machine learning method to predict poultry diseases based on farm management and environmental factors along with organic disease control methods that are sustainable. The researchers compared four machine learning techniques —Decision Trees, Naive Bayes, K-Nearest Neighbor and Random Forest —to see which technique would be best at making predictions regarding poultry disease. The experimental results indicated that the Random Forest approach was able to produce the most accurate predictions with an accuracy rate of 94% and an AUC (Area Under Curve) of .96. Results from cross-validation also showed the Random Forest approach was the most reliable in terms of consistency across different validations and the ability to produce stable results over the multiple validation tests. Environmental factors (temperature, humidity and moisture levels from litter) and vaccination status were found to be primary drivers for the incidence of poultry diseases through feature importance. This finding emphasizes the need for appropriate environmental management and bio-security methods to effectively manage poultry farms. The hybrid predictive framework model includes using predictive analytics with organic methods of managing disease; therefore it represents an integrated and data-based sustainable method of managing poultry health. Additionally, by decreasing dependence on antibiotics, and increasing use of disease prevention measures, this model supports the creation of long-term sustainable poultry production systems. The inclusion of machine learning models in combination with precision livestock technology may also enable poultry producers to develop an "intelligent" poultry health monitoring system that will be able to detect disease risk(s) in poultry in real time. The future research direction should be to expand the dataset utilized in this study by including additional data source(s), such as computer vision and/or sensor based monitoring systems, and development of mobile or cloud based decision support platform(s) that will provide poultry farmers with real-time disease prediction and management recommendations. In summary, the integration of machine learning prediction model(s) into poultry health management practices utilizing sustainable approaches is a promising method to improve poultry disease control, enhance poultry farm productivity, and ensure global food security.

References

Abubakar, A. A., Zira, R. A., Yahaya, A., & Dantata, S. A. (2025). Poultry disease detection using machine learning: A review. Journal of Scientific Development Research. https://doi.org/10.70382/hujsdr.v8i9.005 Benos, L., Tagarakis, A., Dolias, G., Berruto, R., Kateris, D., & Bochtis, D. (2021). Machine learning in agriculture: A comprehensive updated review. Sensors, 21(11), 3758. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21113758 Cover, T., & Hart, P. (1967). Nearest neighbor pattern classification. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 13(1), 21–27. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIT.1967.1053964 Curti, P. D. F., Selli, A., Pinto, D. L., Merlos-Ruiz, A., Balieiro, J. C. C., & Ventura, R. V. (2023). Applications of livestock monitoring devices and machine learning algorithms in animal production and reproduction: An overview. Animal Reproduction, 20(2), e20230077. https://doi.org/10.1590/1984-3143-AR2023-0077 Dunlop, M. W., Blackall, P. J., & Stuetz, R. M. (2016). Water activity of poultry litter: Relationship to moisture content during a grow-out. Journal of Environmental Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.02.036 Food and Agriculture Organization. (2013). Good practices for biosecurity in the pig sector (also applicable to poultry systems). FAO. Kamilaris, A., & Prenafeta-Boldú, F. X. (2018). Deep learning in agriculture: A survey. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 147, 70–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2018.02.016 Liakos, K. G., Busato, P., Moshou, D., Pearson, S., & Bochtis, D. (2018). Machine learning in agriculture: A review. Sensors, 18(8), 2674. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18082674 Liu, Y., Johar, M. G. M., & Haja Mydeen, A. I. (2023). Poultry disease early detection methods using deep learning technology. Indonesian Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, 32(3), 1712–1723. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijeecs.v32.i3.pp1712-1723

Editorial & Review Transparency

Publication Date

5/7/2026

Peer Review Type

Double-Blind Peer Review

Review Rounds: 2

Documents

Review Report (Confidential)
Copyright Form (Office)

Article Metrics & Impact

Article Views

4

Total views since publication

PDF Downloads

7

Total downloads since publication

Geographic Reach

5

Indexing, Archiving & Preservation

Google Scholar
Academia
ResearchGate
Crossref
SSRN
Semantic Scholar
Thomson Reuters
WorldCat
Mendeley
OpenAlex
EBSCO
Zenodo

Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.

Ethics, Compliance & Transparency

Plagiarism Screening

This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.

Funding Information

No funding information available for this research.

Similar & Recommended Articles

Similar Articles by Topic

Related research in the same subject area

Loading similar articles...