Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
10.55041/IJSREM58481
Volume:
10 |
3 |
Mar 2026
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
In today’s data-intensive business environment, organizations increasingly depend on Business Intelligence (BI) tools to support evidence-based decision-making and sustain competitive advantage. This study examines how managers at Mind Box LLC perceive and utilize BI tools as Decision Support Systems (DSS) in their routine and strategic decision processes. Using a descriptive research design, primary data were collected from 100 managers across departments through a structured questionnaire, complemented by secondary data from journals and company documents. The analysis employed percentage statistics, chi-square tests, correlation, and one-way ANOVA to evaluate BI usage patterns, perceived benefits, challenges, and satisfaction levels. Results show high adoption of BI tools, with 75% of managers using them at least weekly and a majority reporting moderate to advanced BI knowledge. Managers report that BI tools improve decision quality, reduce uncertainty and risk, enable faster decisions, and contribute to competitive advantage. Key barriers include insufficient training, data quality issues, and system complexity, while no significant differences in satisfaction were found across managerial levels. The findings underscore that BI tools are effective DSS enablers when supported by robust data governance, continuous training, user-friendly design, and a data-driven culture. The study offers practical recommendations for strengthening BI adoption and maximizing its decision support value at Mind Box and similar technology-driven organizations. This study contributes to the growing literature on BI-enabled decision-making in technology-driven organizations.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
3/29/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
2
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...