Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM68356
Volume:
10 |
10 |
Oct 2026
Pages:
1-12
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

Information Science & Engineering
Jawaharlal Nehru New College Of Engineering

Information Science & Engineering
Jawaharlal Nehru New College Of Engineering

Information Science & Engineering
Jawaharlal Nehru New College Of Engineering

Information Science & Engineering
Jawaharlal Nehru New College Of Engineering
Information Science & Engineering
Jawaharlal Nehru New College Of Engineering
Drug-resistant tuberculosis (TB) complicates treatment planning and prolongs transmission, while conventional drug susceptibility testing (DST) needs specialised laboratories and considerable time. This paper presents TB-OS V2.0, a multimodal research prototype that estimates the resistance of Mycobacterium tuberculosis to five antibiotics, namely rifampicin (RIF), isoniazid (INH), ethambutol (EMB), streptomycin (STR) and pyrazinamide (PZA), from a chest radiograph and a 36-feature genomic profile. A ResNet-18 network analyses the radiograph, an XGBoost model analyses the genomic vector, and an antibiotic-specific logistic-regression meta-learner combines the logit-transformed probabilities of the two branches through late fusion. In total, fifteen frozen models (three tiers for each antibiotic) are trained on antibiotic-specific cohorts from the TB Portals data with strict patient-level splits and zero patient overlap. On held-out test sets, the genomic branch reached ROC-AUC values between 0.9245 and 0.9739, whereas the chest X-ray branch reached 0.6376 to 0.7589. Late fusion produced small ROC-AUC gains for INH, EMB, STR and PZA (+0.0012 to +0.0108) but fell below the genomic model for RIF (0.9481 versus 0.9623). A Flask back end and a React dashboard expose the five independent probabilities, with a mean warm-request latency of 538.07 ms on a CPU-only setup. The results show that multimodal fusion is technically feasible but does not automatically outperform the strongest single modality. The system is a research prototype and not a clinically validated diagnostic tool.
KEYWORDS
This paper presented TB-OS V2.0, a multimodal research prototype that combines a ResNet-18 chest X-ray model and an XGBoost ge-nomic model through an antibiotic-specific logistic-regression late-fusion layer to estimate resistance of M. tuberculosis to rifampicin, isoniazid, ethambutol, streptomycin and pyrazinamide. Fifteen frozen models were trained on antibiotic-specific cohorts with zero patient overlap across splits and exposed through a Flask API and a React dashboard that returns five independent probabilities. On the held-out test sets, the genomic model was the strongest single modality for every drug (ROC-AUC 0.9245 to 0.9739), the chest X-ray model had limited discrimination (0.6376 to 0.7589), and late fusion gave only small changes: a decrease for rifampicin (0.9481 against 0.9623) and gains of at most 0.0108 ROC-AUC for the other four drugs. The ethambutol case also showed that a fixed 0.50 threshold can hide good ranking performance. The work therefore demonstrates that multimodal integration is practical, while showing that it does not automatically beat the best single modality. The system remains a research prototype, and external validation, calibration and clinical evaluation are required before any practical use can be considered.
[1] Y. Xu, Y. Mao, X. Hua, et al., “Machine learning-based prediction of antimicrobial resistance and identification of AMR-related SNPs in My-cobacterium tuberculosis,” BMC Genom. Data, vol. 26, Art. no. 48, 2025, doi: 10.1186/s12863-025-01338-x. [2] B. G. Akwaronwu, F. Y. Ayankoya, S. O. Kuyoro, I. U. Akwaronwu, and O. J. Adeniyi, “Machine learning for predicting drug resistance in tuberculosis: a systematic review of model performance and clinical ap-plications,” Big Data Min. Anal., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 314–337, 2026, doi: 10.26599/BDMA.2025.9020063. [3] M. I. Gröschel, M. Owens, L. Freschi, et al., “GenTB: a user-friendly genome-based predictor for tuberculosis resistance powered by machine learning,” Genome Med., vol. 13, Art. no. 138, 2021, doi: 10.1186/s13073-021-00953-4. [4] B. Lei, T. Zhang, J. Li, J. Qu, W. Xiong, K. Yu, and L. Yang, “Rapidly antibiotic susceptibility prediction via deep learning from bacterial fluo-rescence microscopy images,” IEEE Trans. Autom. Sci. Eng., vol. 22, pp. 21469–21481, 2025, doi: 10.1109/TASE.2025.3607484. [5] G. Y. Liu, D. Yu, M. M. Fan, et al., “Antimicrobial resistance crisis: could artificial intelligence be the solution?,” Mil. Med. Res., vol. 11, Art. no. 7, 2024, doi: 10.1186/s40779-024-00510-1. [6] Y. Wang, Z. Jiang, P. Liang, et al., “TB-DROP: deep learning-based drug resistance prediction of Mycobacterium tuberculosis utilizing whole genome mutations,” BMC Genomics, vol. 25, Art. no. 167, 2024, doi: 10.1186/s12864-024-10066-y. [7] A. Yurtseven, S. Buyanova, A. Agrawal, et al., “Machine learning and phylo-genetic analysis allow for predicting antibiotic resistance in M. tuberculosis,” BMC Microbiol., vol. 23, Art. no. 404, 2023, doi: 10.1186/s12866-023-03147-7. [8] L. F. Parra-Sánchez, S. I. Rivera-Manrique, A. González-Vega, and L. C. Padierna, “A novel antibacterial susceptibility test from microscopic images by deep learning,” IEEE Access, vol. 13, pp. 166670–166685, 2025, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3612431. [9] A. Farrar, C. Feehily, P. Turner, et al., “Infection Inspection: using the power of citizen science for image-based prediction of antibiotic resistance in Escherichia coli treated with ciprofloxacin,” Sci. Rep., vol. 14, Art. no. 19543, 2024, doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-69341-3. [10] S. Kumar, S. Sharma, and K. T. Megra, “Transformer enabled multi-modal medical diagnosis for tuberculosis classification,” J. Big Data, vol. 12, Art. no. 5, 2025, doi: 10.1186/s40537-024-01054-w.
Publication Date
10/26/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
1
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
7
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...