Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM56469
Volume:
10 |
2 |
Feb 2026
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
. Agriculture plays a crucial role in global food security, yet crop productivity is significantly affected by the presence of weeds. Weeds compete with crops for essential resources such as nutrients, water, sunlight, and space, leading to reduced yields and economic losses. Traditional weed management practices, including manual weeding and blanket application of herbicides, are often labor-intensive, costly, time-consuming, and environmentally harmful. In this context, crop–weed classification using machine learning and deep learning techniques has emerged as a promising solution for enabling precise, efficient, and sustainable weed management. Conventional weed control methods largely rely on human expertise or uniform herbicide spraying across entire fields. Manual weed identification is highly subjective, prone to human error, and impractical for large-scale farms. On the other hand, indiscriminate use of herbicides increases production costs, causes herbicide resistance in weeds, degrades soil health, and contaminates water resources. These limitations highlight the need for intelligent automated systems capable of accurately distinguishing crops from weeds in real time. The basics of machine learning based classifiers applied to image classification have also been discussed. Salient features of existing techniques along with the research gap have been clearly highlighted. The research gaps identified in existing work allows future researchers in leveraging the limitations of existing approaches and devising novel methods. Finally the evaluation metrics to evaluate the performance of existing work have been presented for comparative performance evaluation.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
11/1/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
3
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...