Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM68592
Volume:
10 |
10 |
Oct 2026
Pages:
1-4
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Artificial Intelligence & Machine Learning
Zeal Education Society
Artificial Intelligence & Machine Learning
Zeal Education Society
Artificial Intelligence & Machine Learning
Zeal Education Society
Artificial Intelligence & Machine Learning
Zeal Education Society
Artificial Intelligence & Machine Learning
Zeal Education Society
Academic submission work is distributed across classroom announcements, student group conversations, assignment instructions and individual study tasks. Important information such as due dates, deadline changes and required submission components can be difficult to track when embedded in long chat histories. This paper reviews AI and document-oriented information processing for academic submission workflows and presents an implementation-grounded case study of an AI Submission Assistant. The inspected Streamlit application imports exported WhatsApp conversations in text or ZIP form, parses message metadata, identifies task-related messages, resolves selected explicit and relative date expressions, categorizes messages by subject and stores messages and deadlines in SQLite. It also implements duplicate-message filtering, deadline urgency calculation, TF–IDF retrieval of relevant class messages and an optional Anthropic language-model interface for drafting assignment-oriented responses using retrieved context. The review relates these functions to research on large language models in academia, document-level information extraction, document understanding and hallucination in natural language generation. The analysis identifies limitations including rule-based date interpretation, imperfect event-to-assignment matching, dependence on announcement quality, the need for human verification and the absence of a demonstrated document-file export function in the inspected code. No quantitative accuracy or usability claims are made because a controlled evaluation dataset and measured results were not supplied. The paper concludes with a validation framework and development directions for improving reliability, transparency and usefulness.Academic submission work is distributed across classroom announcements, student group conversations, assignment instructions and individual study tasks. Important information such as due dates, deadline changes and required submission components can be difficult to track when embedded in long chat histories. This paper reviews AI and document-oriented information processing for academic submission workflows and presents an implementation-grounded case study of an AI Submission Assistant. The inspected Streamlit application imports exported WhatsApp conversations in text or ZIP form, parses message metadata, identifies task-related messages, resolves selected explicit and relative date expressions, categorizes messages by subject and stores messages and deadlines in SQLite. It also implements duplicate-message filtering, deadline urgency calculation, TF–IDF retrieval of relevant class messages and an optional Anthropic language-model interface for drafting assignment-oriented responses using retrieved context. The review relates these functions to research on large language models in academia, document-level information extraction, document understanding and hallucination in natural language generation. The analysis identifies limitations including rule-based date interpretation, imperfect event-to-assignment matching, dependence on announcement quality, the need for human verification and the absence of a demonstrated document-file export function in the inspected code. No quantitative accuracy or usability claims are made because a controlled evaluation dataset and measured results were not supplied. The paper concludes with a validation framework and development directions for improving reliability, transparency and usefulness.
KEYWORDS
This review examined the research foundations and implementation of an AI Submission Assistant for managing academic tasks communicated through WhatsApp class groups. The inspected application combines chat-export parsing, rule-based task and date extraction, subject categorization, SQLite persistence, duplicate-message filtering, urgency-based deadline presentation, TF–IDF retrieval and optional LLM-based assignment-answer drafting. These functions demonstrate a practical integration of information extraction, lightweight information retrieval and generative AI in a student workflow. The review also shows why such a system must be treated as an assistive tool rather than an autonomous authority. Rule-based extraction can misinterpret ambiguous messages, retrieval may omit relevant context and language models can generate inaccurate content. The current implementation does not yet provide verified assignment-level event linking, measured performance evidence or automatic document-file export. Future development should prioritize source-linked deadline changes, stronger semantic understanding, privacy safeguards, answer verification and transparent evaluation. With these improvements and a documented test study, the system could provide a more reliable foundation for academic submission management.
[1] J. G. Meyer, R. J. Urbanowicz, P. C. N. Martin, K. O’Connor, R. Li, P.-C. Peng, T. J. Bright, N. Tatonetti, K. J. Won, G. Gonzalez-Hernandez, and J. H. Moore, “ChatGPT and large language models in academia: opportunities and challenges,” BioData Mining, vol. 16, art. 20, 2023, doi: 10.1186/s13040-023-00339-9. [2] H. Zheng, S. Wang, and L. Huang, “A comprehensive survey on document-level information extraction,” in Proc. Workshop on the Future of Event Detection (FuturED), 2024, pp. 58–72, doi: 10.18653/v1/2024.futured-1.6. [3] A. M. Rombach and P. Fettke, “Deep learning based key information extraction from business documents: systematicliterature review,” ACM Computing Surveys, vol. 58, no. 2,pp. 1–37, 2025, doi: 10.1145/3749369. [4] Z. Ji et al., “Survey of hallucination in natural language generation,” ACM Computing Surveys, vol. 55, no. 12, art. 248, 2023, doi: 10.1145/3571730.
Publication Date
10/31/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
2
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
6
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...