Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
10.55041/IJSREM56339
Volume:
10 |
2 |
Feb 2026
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
The construction industry is under increasing pressure to reduce its environmental footprint while maintaining structural performance and durability. One promising approach is the development of sustainable concrete through the partial replacement of cement and natural aggregates with industrial and agricultural by-products, coupled with fiber reinforcement. This review paper critically examines existing research on the use of fly ash as a partial replacement of cement and coconut shell as a partial replacement of coarse aggregate in Steel Fiber Reinforced Concrete (SFRC). The paper synthesizes findings related to fresh properties, mechanical performance, durability characteristics, and sustainability benefits of fly ash–coconut shell–SFRC systems. Particular attention is given to the role of steel fibers in mitigating strength loss, enhancing ductility, and improving crack resistance. The review identifies optimal replacement ranges, discusses key challenges such as workability and water absorption, and highlights research gaps for future investigation. The study concludes that fly ash–coconut shell–SFRC represents a viable and eco-friendly alternative to conventional concrete, with strong potential for structural and non-structural applications.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
5/1/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
2
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...