Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM63051
Volume:
10 |
5 |
May 2026
Pages:
1--
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
Priyadarshni college of Engineering,Nagpur,Maharastra
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
Priyadarshni college of Engineering,Nagpur,Maharastra
Cr-Mn Austenitic Stainless Steel (ASS) generally used in pressurised water reactor and nuclear processing water reactor and nuclear processing reactor etc. due to ease of welding. The welding fillers are used generally ER308L and ER308-16 n SMAW and GMAW. It studies microstructure, tensile strength, hardness, impact strength and intergranular corrosion (DLEPR test). These steels are extensively used in railway, automotive, structural industries where welding is used as an manufacturing process.[1] Among various welding methods, Shielded Metal Arc Welding (SMAW) and Gas Metal Arc Welding (GMAW) are the most widely employed due to their operational flexibility and industrial applicability. This review paper presents a detailed comparison of SMAW and GMAW welding techniques used for joining Cr–Mn austenitic stainless steels. The influence of welding parameters such as heat input, welding speed, filler material and shielding environment on microstructure, ferrite formation, mechanical properties, heat affected zone (HAZ), corrosion resistance and sensitization behaviour is discussed in detail. The review highlights that SMAW generally produces higher ferrite content and better resistance to solidification cracking, whereas GMAW offers superior weld appearance, smaller HAZ and higher productivity. The paper also summarizes recent developments, challenges and future research directions in the welding of Cr–Mn stainless steels.
KEYWORDS
1) Tensile strength decrease with increase in welding speed in both GMAW and SMAW on Ultra Low Nickel Cr-Mn ASS (ULASS). The Tensile strength is found highest in SMAW at Low Welding Speed (LWS) of 3mm/s.The Ferritscope test reveals that ferrite Content in the Weld Metal is increasing with the increase in welding speed. SMAW posses higher ferrite content then GMAW. 2) Microstructure examination of weld zone shows dendrites of δ ferrite in both the processes. The Heat Affected Zone (HAZ) is decreasing with the increase in welding speed. 3) The impact Values decreases with the increase in welding speed in both GMAW and SMAW on Ultra Low Nickel Cr-Mn ASS (ULASS). At Low Welding Speed (LWS) the Impact values are highest. 4) The DLEPR results reveal that SMAW and GMAW welded joint are susceptible to Intergranular corrosion of welded joints. Welding of Ultra low nickel Cr-Mn Austenitic stainless steel (ULNASS) with GMAW is more susceptible to intergranular corrosion attack as compared to SMAW. Sensitization decreases with increase in welding speed. However, both SMAW and GMAW are more susceptible to IGC as compared to Base Metal. 5) The hardness is decreasing with the increase in welding speed in both the SMAW and GMAW. The Hardness at Heat Affected Zone (HAZ) is increasing with decrease in welding speed. In both the processes the hardness at the weld zone is less than the hardness at the base metal.
1 Finite element study of thermal behaviour in ultra low nickel Cr-Mn ASS welded with SMAW and GMAW Tech Nuclear Energy and Tech 11(4) 271-277 2. A. Kumar, R. Singh and P. Sharma, “Microstructure and corrosion behavior of Cr–Mn stainless steel welds,” Journal of Materials Research and Technology, vol. 12, pp. 100–110, 2024. 3. Reddy and P. Rao, “Comparative study of SMAW and GMAW on Cr–Mn ASS,” Materials Today Proceedings, vol. 45, pp. 2300–2307, 2023. 4 V. Singh, K. Patel and M. Joshi, “Effect of welding parameters on stainless steel weldments,” International Journal of Engineering Research, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 55–61, 2022. 5 P. Kumar and D. Verma, “Corrosion behavior of Cr–Mn stainless steel welded joints,” International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, vol. 18, pp. 210–220, 2021. 6 R. Sharma and S. Gupta, “Microstructural analysis of stainless-steel weldments,” Materials Science Forum, vol. 980, pp. 145–152, 2020. 7 M. Patel and S. Jain, “Effect of heat input on ferrite formation in stainless steel welds,” Welding Journal, vol. 97, no. 8, pp. 255–263, 2019. 8 T. Rao and K. Ramesh, “Mechanical characterization of welded stainless steel joints,” Journal of Materials Engineering, vol. 14, pp. 85–93, 2018. 9 N. Gupta and A. Verma, “Sensitization studies in welded stainless steels,” International Journal of Corrosion Science, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 75–83, 2017. 10 Sindu Kou,; ‘ Welding Metallurgy’ ,Wiley interscience, (2003) 11 Vashishtha H ,Taiwade RV et al. Effect of austenitic fillers on microstructure a mechanical properties of ultra low nickel austenite SS . Sci tech Weld joining .2016,21(4):331-337 12 J C Lippod, D J Kotecki.; ‘Weld12ing Metallurgy and Welability of Stainless Steels’, wiley imterscience, (2005) 13 Wichan Chuaiphana,, Loeshpahn Srijaroenpramong, ‘Effect of welding speed on microstructures, mechanical propertiesand corrosion behavior of GTA-welded AISI 201 stainless steel sheets’, jourmal of Material Processing Technology,(2014).
Publication Date
5/11/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
3
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...