Crossref DOIMemberCiteFactoropen accessissn
SJIF Impact Factor 8.659 | ISSN: 2582-3930
IJSREM Logo

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management

(Gateway to Global Scholars - An International, Scholarly, Multi-Disciplinary, Open Access Journal)

Peer-Reviewed Journal Designed to Meet UGC's Quality Parameters

HomeCurrent IssuePast IssuesPay OnlineConferencesEditorial BoardAbout UsContact Us
IJSREM

Loading article...

Follow Us

  • Google Scholar
  • ResearchGate
  • Academia.edu
  • Mendeley
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Instagram

Journal Policies

  • Peer Review Policy
  • Publication Ethics
  • Copyright Infringement
  • Refund & Cancellation Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Journal Identifiers & Licenses

  • ISSN Verified: 2582-3930ISSN Verified: 2582-3930
  • Crossref DOI: 10.55041Crossref DOI: 10.55041
  • SJIF Ranking: 08.659SJIF Ranking: 08.659
  • Licensed under CC BY 4.0Licensed under CC BY 4.0
  • ISO Certification: 9001:2015ISO Certification: 9001:2015
  • Indexed & Cited In: Google ScholarIndexed & Cited In: Google Scholar

Contact Us

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management (IJSREM)

#62/1, New No 7, 1st Cross, 2nd Main, Ganganagar, R T Nagar, Bangalore North, Bangalore, Karnataka, India – 560032
[email protected]+91 93911 67991
logos
logos
Working Hours

Mon – Sat: 9:00 AM – 6:00 PM

Sunday: 10:00 AM – 4:00 PM

+91 93911 67991

© 2026 IJSREM – International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management. This is an open-access journal. Articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
ArticlePeer ReviewedOpen AccessPlagiarism Passed
Paper ID:IJSREM67977

A Risk-Weighted Framework for Integrating Technical Vulnerability Intelligence into Information Security Compliance Audits

Stream/Area:

-

Subject:

-

Paper ID:

IJSREM67977

Volume:

10 |

10 |

Oct 2026

Pages:

1-5

Publication Frequency:

Monthly (12 issues per year)

DOI
Digital Object Identifier
10.55041/IJSREM67977

License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

Share this article:

Authors

KV

Kalpana Verma

Computer Science and Engineering

Compucom Institute of Technology and Management

Download Author Certificate
HG

Himanshu Gautam

Computer Science and Engineering

Compucom Institute of Technology and Management

Download Co-Author Certificate
GKD

Gaurav Kumar Das

Computer Science and Engineering

Compucom Institute of Technology and Management

Download Co-Author Certificate

Author Services & Downloads

Full ArticlesAcceptance Certificate

Abstract

Compliance audits against frameworks such as ISO/IEC 27001, PCI DSS, SOC 2, and NIST CSF are typically conducted independently of technical vulnerability assessment and penetration testing, producing two disconnected risk narratives: a documentation-based compliance view and a CVSS-based technical view. This gap allows controls to be reported “implemented” on audit checklists while remaining technically exploitable, and causes remediation resources to be prioritized inconsistently. This paper proposes the Vulnerability-Aligned Compliance Audit Framework (VACAF), which maps technical finding categories (CWE) to compliance control objectives (principally ISO/IEC 27001 Annex A) and computes a Risk-Weighted Compliance Score (RWCS) that combines documented control maturity with technical severity (CVSS). VACAF is embedded within the standard plan–fieldwork–reporting audit lifecycle so that it can be adopted without redesigning existing audit methodology. Using an illustrative, simulated case study, this paper demonstrates that RWCS-based prioritization redirects attention toward control areas where documentation weaknesses and severe technical exposure coincide — notably vulnerability management and network security — more effectively than compliance-only or CVSS-only prioritization used in isolation. The paper discusses the practical implications, limitations of the illustrative evaluation, and directions for empirical validation.

KEYWORDS

Information Security Audit; Compliance; ISO/IEC 27001; Vulnerability Management; CVSS; Risk-Weighted Scoring; Cybersecurity Governance.

Cite This Article

Kalpana Verma, Himanshu Gautam, Gaurav Kumar Das, "A Risk-Weighted Framework for Integrating Technical Vulnerability Intelligence into Information Security Compliance Audits," International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management, vol. 10, no. 10, pp. 1-5, Oct 2026. https://doi.org/10.55041/IJSREM67977

Full Article/Conclusion

This paper presented VACAF, a framework for integrating technical vulnerability intelligence into compliance audits through a control-to-vulnerability mapping model and a Risk-Weighted Compliance Score, embedded within the standard audit lifecycle. Demonstrated on an illustrative case study, RWCS-based prioritization redirected attention toward control areas where documentation weaknesses and severe technical exposure coincide, correcting a blind spot in both compliance-only and CVSS-only prioritization. The results reported here are illustrative rather than empirical; future work includes validating VACAF against real, anonymized, multi-cycle audit data, extending the mapping table to full coverage of ISO/IEC 27001 Annex A and to other frameworks (NIST CSF, PCI DSS, SOC 2), and exploring semi-automated mapping using vulnerability-scanner taxonomies and cautious LLM-assisted classification.

References

[1] ISO/IEC 27001:2022, Information security, cybersecurity and privacy protection — Information security management systems — Requirements, ISO, Geneva, 2022. [2]   National Institute of Standards and Technology, “The NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) 2.0,” NIST CSWP 29, Feb. 2024. [3] National Institute of Standards and Technology, “Security and Privacy Controls for Information Systems and Organizations,” NIST SP 800-53, Rev. 5, 2020. [4] PCI Security Standards Council, “Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard, Version 4.0,” 2022. [5] AICPA, “2017 Trust Services Criteria for Security, Availability, Processing Integrity, Confidentiality, and Privacy (SOC 2),” revised 2022. [6] Verizon, “2024 Data Breach Investigations Report,” Verizon Business, 2024. [7] IBM Security, “Cost of a Data Breach Report 2024,” IBM Corporation, 2024. [8] D. McQuade, “Leveraging Large Language Models for Security-Focused Code Reviews,” SANS Technology Institute Graduate Student Research, 2025. [9] R. Wehe, “Out-of-Band Defense: Securing VPNs from Password-Spray Attacks with Cloud Automation,” SANS Technology Institute Graduate Student Research, 2025. [10] J. Mull, “From Crash to Compromise: Unlocking the Potential of Windows Crash Dumps in Offensive Security,” SANS Technology Institute Graduate Student Research, 2025.

Editorial & Review Transparency

Publication Date

10/14/2026

Peer Review Type

Double-Blind Peer Review

Review Rounds: 2

Documents

Review Report (Confidential)
Copyright Form (Office)

Article Metrics & Impact

Article Views

1

Total views since publication

PDF Downloads

5

Total downloads since publication

Geographic Reach

5

Indexing, Archiving & Preservation

Google Scholar
Academia
ResearchGate
Crossref
SSRN
Semantic Scholar
Thomson Reuters
WorldCat
Mendeley
OpenAlex
EBSCO
Zenodo

Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.

Ethics, Compliance & Transparency

Plagiarism Screening

This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.

Funding Information

No funding information available for this research.

Similar & Recommended Articles

Similar Articles by Topic

Related research in the same subject area

Loading similar articles...