Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM68081
Volume:
10 |
10 |
Oct 2026
Pages:
1-8
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Bachelor of Business Administration
Koneru Lakshmaiah University
Bachelor of Business Administration
Koneru Lakshmaiah University
This study analyzes the relationship between the price sensitivity, safety/security perceptions, and inflation-hedging perceptions, and their relationship with household gold-investment decision. The data supplied with the questionnaire consists of 156 responses, and it contains the following types of data: demographic data, current position regarding gold investment, preferred form of investment, multi-item Likert-type statements, and a relative-ranking question. Composite scores were computed as the average of items available for each construct. Descriptive statistics, Chi square tests, One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), and multiple linear regression were reported. The means were 3.675 for price sensitivity, 3.850 for safety/security, 3.777 for inflation hedging and 3.710 for the gold-investment decision score. The regression model was statistically significant, F(3, 152) = 80.88, p < .001, and accounted for 61.5% of the variance in the decision score (R² = .615; adjusted R² = .607). Price sensitivity (B = .242, p = .001) and inflation hedging (B = .506, p < .001) were statistically significant positive predictors. The safety/security effect was not statistically significant at the 5% level (B = .137, p = .054). Results are exploratory and should be interpreted with caution due to high concentration of younger respondents, low internal consistency of the price-sensitivity scale, some expected counts are small in some of the demographic tables, and full sampling and reference information was not provided.
KEYWORDS
This study analyzed the answers to the questions addressing sensitivity to price, safety/security, and perceptions of inflation-hedging in the context of a composite gold-investment decision score. The regression was statistically significant, accounting for 61.5% of the variance observed. Price sensitivity and inflation hedging were significant positive predictors, whereas safety/security was not statistically significant at the 5% level following the other predictors. There was a statistically significant difference between the education groups in the decision scores; however additional assumption checks and post hoc comparisons analyses are necessary. The results of the chi-square tests are presented with caution as there are some tables with few expected counts. Generally, the results are preliminary and not generalizable. More robust measurement, full documentation of the sample, diagnostic assessments, and authentic reference needs to be established, prior to drawing broader conclusions.
Khatri, H., & Chhikara, K. S. (2025) https://www.theaspd.com/ijes.php Rathore, H. S. (2017) https://ssrn.com/abstract=3046646 Thapa, B., & Shah, A. K. (2020) https://doi.org/10.3126/jbssr.v5i2.35234 Nawaz, M. N., & Sudindra, V. R. (2013) https://ssrn.com/abstract=3525301
Publication Date
10/19/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
3
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
5
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...