Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM63226
Volume:
10 |
5 |
May 2026
Pages:
1-10
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

BUSINESS ANALYTICS
Zeal Institute of Management and Computer Application

Assistant Professor
Zeal Institute of Management and Computer Application

Assistant professor
Zeal Institute of Management and Computer Application
Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) is increasingly being used as a practical support tool for managers, especially for summarizing information, preparing reports, and exploring alternative courses of action. This paper studies how GenAI influences key aspects of managerial decision-making: decision-cycle speed, perceived decision quality, trust and transparency, adoption barriers, and perceived strategic return on investment (ROI). A quantitative survey was conducted with 100 mid-to-senior managers who have professional exposure to GenAI tools. The findings indicate that higher frequency of GenAI use, by itself, did not translate into faster decisions (r = 0.01; p > 0.90). In contrast, using GenAI for information synthesis was associated with higher perceived decision confidence and analytical depth (t-test p < 0.05; correlation r = 0.25; p < 0.01). The results also suggest that AI literacy and structured Human-in-the-Loop (HITL) practices are linked with greater trust and decision transparency. Concerns about hallucinations and data privacy remain major adoption constraints, reinforcing the need for verification and governance. Overall, GenAI appears to add the most value when treated as an assistant that improves the quality of managerial thinking, while responsibility and final judgment remain with the manager.
KEYWORDS
This study shows that GenAI is already influencing managerial work, particularly where decisions depend on reading, synthesizing, and communicating large amounts of information. Within our sample, the strongest observed benefit is higher perceived decision confidence and analytical depth when GenAI is used for synthesis and drafting (H2 supported). In contrast, GenAI usage frequency alone did not show a measurable relationship with perceived decision speed (H1 not supported). These results suggest that adoption intensity is not sufficient by itself; the value managers perceive depends on how GenAI is applied to decision-relevant tasks. The study also highlights a condition for sustainable value: responsible use. Because managers remain accountable for outcomes, organizations need practical support such as AI literacy programs, clear guidance on data handling, and Human-in-the-Loop checkpoints for high-impact outputs. This recommendation is consistent with risk management and governance guidance that emphasizes accountability, privacy safeguards, and traceability for trustworthy AI use (NIST, 2023; IBM Institute for Business Value, 2023). In summary, the evidence from this research supports treating GenAI as a capability that strengthens decision preparation and managerial communication rather than as an autonomous decision-maker. When combined with verification habits, privacy safeguards, and clear accountability, managers can use GenAI to improve the quality of decision inputs without weakening governance.
[1] A. Agrawal, J. S. Gans, and A. Goldfarb, Prediction Machines, Updated and Expanded: The Simple Economics of Artificial Intelligence. Harvard Business Review Press, 2022. [2] E. Brynjolfsson, D. Li, and J. J. Raymond, Generative AI at Work. National Bureau of Economic Research, 2023. [3] T. H. Davenport and S. M. Miller, Working with AI: Real Stories of Human Machine Collaboration. MIT Press, 2022. [4] Deloitte, The State of Generative AI in the Enterprise: Now Decides Next. Deloitte AI Institute, 2024. [5] Gartner, Top Strategic Technology Trends for 2024: AI-Augmented Development and Management, 2024. [6] M. M. Mariani and Y. K. Dwivedi, Generative artificial intelligence in management: A research agenda for the era of large language models, International Journal of Information Management, 2024. [7] McKinsey Global Institute, The economic potential of generative AI: The next productivity frontier, 2023. [8] E. Mollick, Co-Intelligence: Living and Working with AI. Portfolio/Penguin, 2024. [9] E. M. Bender, T. Gebru, A. McMillan-Major, and S. Shmitchell, On the dangers of stochastic parrots: Can language models be too big?, in Proc. ACM Conf. Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, pp. 610-6123, 2021. [10] R. Cui, D. Li, and J. Zhang, The impact of generative AI on productivity and work quality: Evidence from knowledge work tasks, SSRN Electronic Journal, 2024.
Publication Date
5/15/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
2
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...