Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM68144
Volume:
10 |
10 |
Oct 2026
Pages:
1-6
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
PG CLINICAL PSYCOLOGY
Jain (Deemed-to-be University), Bangalore
Mental health concerns are increasingly recognised as a workplace issue, yet employees may avoid professional care because of stigma and practical or attitudinal barriers. This study examined the relationship between perceived mental health stigma and barriers to accessing professional mental health care among corporate employees. A quantitative, cross-sectional correlational design was used. Eighty-five employed adults from varied sectors and Indian cities completed an online questionnaire. Perceived stigma was measured using six items adapted from Britt et al. (2008), and barriers were measured with the 30-item Barriers to Access to Care Evaluation (BACE; Clement et al., 2012); five practical-barrier items adapted from Britt et al. were also administered. Spearman’s correlation showed a positive association between perceived stigma and total BACE barriers (ρ = .55, 95% CI [.37, .69], p < .001). Stigma was also associated with treatment-stigma barriers (ρ = .59) and non-stigma barriers (ρ = .48). In hierarchical regression (n = 79), perceived stigma explained an additional 13.3% of variance in BACE scores after demographic variables and practical barriers were considered. The most highly rated barrier was wanting to solve the problem independently; concern about career harm was the highest-rated stigma-related barrier. Because the study was cross-sectional and based on a modest, non-probability sample, the findings do not establish causation. The results suggest that workplace mental health initiatives should address stigma, confidentiality and career-related fears while making routes to professional support clear.
KEYWORDS
Among the 85 employed adults in this study, perceived mental health stigma was positively associated with total barriers to professional care, treatment-stigma barriers and non-stigma barriers. It also explained additional variance in barriers after demographic variables and practical barriers were considered. Wanting to solve problems independently was the most strongly endorsed barrier, while concern about career harm was the highest-rated stigma-related barrier. The findings support workplace approaches that combine stigma reduction, confidentiality assurance, visible access pathways and practical support. The results are correlational and should be confirmed in larger and more representative samples.
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T Britt, T. W., Greene-Shortridge, T. M., Brink, S., Nguyen, Q. B., Rath, J., Cox, A. L., Hoge, C. W., & Castro, C. A. (2008). Perceived stigma and barriers to care for psychological treatment: Implications for reactions to stressors in different contexts. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 27(4), 317–335. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.2008.27.4.317 Clement, S., Brohan, E., Jeffery, D., Henderson, C., Hatch, S. L., & Thornicroft, G. (2012). Development and psychometric properties the Barriers to Access to Care Evaluation scale (BACE) related to people with mental ill health. BMC Psychiatry, 12, Article 36. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-12-36 Corrigan, P. (2004). How stigma interferes with mental health care. American Psychologist, 59(7), 614–625. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.59.7.614 Corrigan, P. W., & Watson, A. C. (2002). Understanding the impact of stigma on people with mental illness. World Psychiatry, 1(1), 16–20. Link, B. G., Cullen, F. T., Struening, E., Shrout, P. E., & Dohrenwend, B. P. (1989). A modified labeling theory approach to mental disorders: An empirical assessment. American Sociological Review, 54(3), 400–423.
Publication Date
10/20/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
1
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
6
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...