Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM62041
Volume:
10 |
4 |
April 2026
Pages:
1-6
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

Department of MBA
PANIMALAR ENGINEERING COLLEGE
Capital budgeting occupies a central position in financial management, serving as the primary mechanism through which organisations assess and commit to long-term investment projects. This study empirically examines the application and effectiveness of standard capital budgeting techniques — Payback Period (PBP), Accounting Rate of Return (ARR), Net Present Value (NPV), Internal Rate of Return (IRR), and Profitability Index (PI) — at Century Plyboards (India) Limited, a leading publicly listed wood panel manufacturer, over the five-year period 2021–2025. Secondary financial data were sourced exclusively from the company's published annual reports and audited financial statements. The analysis reveals that the NPV for the study period is positive at ₹296.22 lakhs and the IRR stands at 15.31%, both indicating overall investment viability. However, the PBP exhibits an increasing trend, rising from 0.44 years in 2021 to 1.47 years in 2025, while the ARR declines from 227.87% to 67.80% over the same period, and the PI falls below unity in 2024 and 2025. These converging signals suggest that although the company's investment base is growing, the efficiency of capital deployment is declining. The study contributes practical insights into how capital budgeting tools can be integrated with comparative balance sheet analysis to assess investment efficiency in a capital-intensive manufacturing firm, and offers actionable recommendations to strengthen long-term financial performance.
KEYWORDS
This study has examined the application of capital budgeting techniques at Century Plyboards (India) Limited across a five-year period (2021–2025), employing PBP, ARR, NPV, IRR, and PI as analytical instruments. The primary conclusion is that while aggregate investment viability is confirmed by a positive NPV and a comfortably positive IRR, the temporal trajectory of annual efficiency metrics signals a meaningful and sustained decline in the marginal productivity of capital. The company's investment programme, while strategically necessary in the context of industry growth, has been accompanied by an escalation in capital costs and a compression in cash flow returns per unit of investment that demands managerial attention. On the basis of these findings, the following recommendations are advanced: • Capital Structure Optimisation: The firm should review its financing strategy to reduce reliance on short-term borrowings for long-term investments, seeking to match asset and liability tenors more effectively. • Post-Completion Audits: Systematic post-completion project audits should be institutionalised to benchmark actual cash flows against projected estimates, enabling continuous improvement in appraisal accuracy. • Scenario and Sensitivity Analysis: Sensitivity analysis examining the effect of ±10–20% changes in key variables (revenue growth, discount rate, raw material costs) should be incorporated as a standard component of every investment appraisal. • Working Capital Management: Tighter control over receivables and inventory — consistent with the observed increases in trade receivables and inventories — would improve operating cash conversion and reduce the gap between accounting profit and free cash flow. • ESG Integration: In alignment with emerging regulatory requirements and investor expectations, the company should begin integrating environmental and sustainability metrics into its long-term capital planning processes. Future research may extend this analysis through a comparative multi-firm study across the Indian wood panel sector, or by employing stochastic modelling techniques such as Monte Carlo simulation to account explicitly for uncertainty in cash flow projections. Incorporating qualitative data from managerial interviews would further enrich understanding of how capital budgeting decisions are made in practice at firms of this type.
[1] R. A. Brealey and S. C. Myers, Principles of Corporate Finance, 14th ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, 2022. [2] A. Damodaran, Corporate Finance: Theory and Practice, 4th ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, 2022. [3] N. Singh, "Role of capital budgeting in long-term investment," unpublished manuscript, 2025. [4] P. Sharma, "Capital budgeting techniques: Methods businesses use to evaluate potential investments," Advances in Consumer Research, vol. 2, no. 2, 2025. [5] M. Patawari and N. K. Sarawgi, "Measuring impact of capital budgeting techniques on financial performance," Pacific Business Review International, vol. 17, no. 6, 2024. [6] W. A. Shaheen, T. Saleem, N. Shafi, and U. Ullah, "Systematic literature review on capital budgeting techniques," UCP Journal of Business Perspectives, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 17–29, 2024. [7] M. V. Sokolov, "NPV, IRR, PI, PP, and DPP: A unified view," Journal of Mathematical Economics, vol. 114, p. 102992, 2024. [8] C. Su, "Literature review on the net present value method of project investment decision," Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences, vol. 60, pp. 60–66, 2024. [9] S. A. Azlika et al., "The importance of capital budgeting in long-term investment decision making," Journal of Accounting Research, Utility Finance and Digital Assets, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 602–606, 2023. [10] F. Mirembe, "The impact of capital budgeting techniques on financial performance of micro and small business enterprises," unpublished manuscript, 2023. [11] A. S. Sinaga et al., "Comparison of capital budgeting methods: NPV, IRR, payback period," World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 1078–1081, 2023. [12] J. Mota and A. C. Moreira, "Capital budgeting practices: A survey of two industries," Journal of Risk and Financial Management, vol. 16, no. 3, p. 191, 2023. [13] E. Cotter, "Net present value and payback period: An analysis," unpublished thesis, 2023. [14] P. Poonam, H. Aneja, and S. Bahi, "The impact of capital budgeting techniques on automobile companies in India: An empirical study," 2022. [15] V. Mohan and K. P. Narwal, "Investigation of theory–practice gap in capital budgeting practices: A study of the manufacturing sector in India," 2022. [16] J. Huang et al., "Application and comparison of NPV and IRR methods in company investment decisions," in Proc. 7th Int. Conf. Financial Innovation and Economic Development (ICFIED), Atlantis Press, 2022. [17] S. Siziba and J. H. Hall, "The evolution of the application of capital budgeting techniques in enterprises," Global Finance Journal, vol. 47, p. 100504, 2021. [18] M. Chandrasekaran, "A study on capital budgeting," unpublished manuscript, 2019. [19] J. C. Imegi and G. A. Nwokoye, "The effectiveness of capital budgeting techniques in evaluating projects' profitability," African Research Review, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 166–188, 2015. [20] I. E. Ahmed, "Factors determining the selection of capital budgeting techniques," Journal of Finance and Investment Analysis, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 77–88, 2013.
Publication Date
4/30/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
3
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...