Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM64049
Volume:
10 |
5 |
May 2026
Pages:
1-4
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

MBA
Rathinam Technical Campus
MBA
Rathinam Technical Campus
This study investigates customer satisfaction in the reverse logistics operations of Flipkart, India's leading e-commerce platform, with a specific focus on the Coimbatore region. Using a structured questionnaire administered to 100 Flipkart customers between January and March 2026, the research analyses key dimensions of the returns experience including ease of return, tracking transparency, refund timeliness, and overall policy satisfaction. Quantitative methods — simple percentage analysis, chi-square tests, and Pearson correlation — were employed to uncover relationships between return process attributes and customer satisfaction. The study finds that customer satisfaction with Flipkart's reverse logistics system ranges from 68% to 82%, that return-process ease and tracking quality are significantly correlated with overall satisfaction (r = 0.466, p < 0.001), and that unmet quality expectations drive the majority of returns (42.39%). Findings offer actionable insights for e-commerce operators seeking to optimise reverse supply chains and strengthen customer loyalty.
KEYWORDS
This study demonstrates that Flipkart's reverse logistics operations in Coimbatore achieve satisfactory customer outcomes, with overall satisfaction rates between 68% and 82% and a return cycle predominantly completed within one week. Three chi-square analyses and a Pearson correlation confirm that return-process convenience, ease, and tracking transparency are the primary drivers of satisfaction — not promotional incentives or brand reputation. The dominant cause of returns — quality not matching expectations — points to a preventable upstream issue that better product descriptions and pre-dispatch quality checks could address. Practically, Flipkart and competing e-commerce operators should focus on: (i) simplifying the return initiation process so customers can complete it without staff intervention; (ii) expanding door-pickup coverage to eliminate the need for customers to visit drop-off centres; (iii) enhancing real-time tracking notifications throughout the return journey; and (iv) investing in more accurate product listings to reduce quality-mismatch returns. Given that more than 95% of consumers are willing to repurchase from a retailer with a positive return experience, optimising reverse logistics represents a direct lever for revenue retention and customer loyalty. This study is limited by its geographic scope (Coimbatore) and convenience sampling. Future research should extend the framework to multiple cities, incorporate seller-side data, and apply structural equation modelling to test causal relationships among reverse logistics dimensions.
Amini, M. M., & Retzlaff-Roberts, D. (1999). Reverse logistics process reengineering: Improving customer service quality. Issues in Supply Chain Management. Alinovi, A., Bottani, E., & Montanari, R. (2012). Reverse logistics: A stochastic EOQ-based inventory control model for mixed manufacturing/remanufacturing systems. International Journal of Production Research, 50(5), 1243–1264. Bernon, M., Rossi, S., & Cullen, J. (2011). Retail reverse logistics: A call and grounding framework for research. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 41(5), 484–510. Carrasco-Gallego, R., & Ponce-Cueto, E. (2009). Forecasting the returns in reusable container systems. An application to the Spanish beer industry. DYNA Revista de la Facultad de Minas, 76(158), 173–182. Jayaraman, V., & Luo, Y. (2007). Creating competitive advantages through new value creation: A reverse logistics perspective. Academy of Management Perspectives, 21(2), 56–73. Mothilal, S., Gunasekaran, A., Nachiappan, S. P., & Jayaram, J. (2012). Key success factors and their performance implications in the Indian third-party logistics (3PL) industry. International Journal of Production Research, 50(9), 2407–2422. Omar, M. W., Jusoff, K., & Hj Hussin, H. (2010). Customer satisfaction and loyalty in online shopping. World Applied Sciences Journal, 10(Special Issue of e-Commerce), 63–69.
Publication Date
5/26/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
3
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...