Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM66960
Volume:
10 |
8 |
Aug 2026
Pages:
1-5
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Master of Business Administration
Malla Reddy Engineering College and Management Sciences
Master of Business Administration
Malla Reddy Engineering College and Management Sciences
Decision-making is a fundamental managerial responsibility that directly influences organizational performance, employee productivity, customer satisfaction, and strategic success. This study examines decision-making behaviour among managers in corporate organizations with specific reference to Capgemini. It focuses on information use, evaluation of alternatives, risk assessment, leadership style, organizational culture, technology, and employee participation. Primary data were collected from 100 Capgemini managers through a structured questionnaire using convenience sampling. Percentage analysis was applied to interpret the responses. The findings indicate that managers generally adopt systematic, data-driven and collaborative approaches, while leadership, risk assessment, technology, and organizational culture significantly shape managerial decision-making effectiveness practices overall.
KEYWORDS
Decision-making is a critical managerial function that directly affects organizational performance, project success, employee productivity, customer satisfaction, and strategic effectiveness. The study of decision-making behaviour among managers at Capgemini shows that managerial decisions are influenced by information availability, data usage, alternative evaluation, risk assessment, leadership style, organizational culture, technology, and employee participation. The analysis indicates that 77% of managers consider data before making decisions, demonstrating a strong preference for evidence-based managerial practices. Similarly, 73% recognize the importance of risk assessment, showing that managers consider uncertainty and possible consequences before making decisions. The study also reveals that 73% of respondents believe leadership style affects decision quality. Overall, Capgemini managers appear to follow systematic, data-driven, risk-conscious, and collaborative approaches to decision-making. The findings suggest that organizations can further improve managerial effectiveness by strengthening analytical skills, leadership capabilities, technology utilization, employee participation, risk-management practices, and decision-support systems. Effective decision-making requires a balanced combination of accurate information, analytical reasoning, managerial experience, leadership, collaboration, and timely action. Therefore, developing these capabilities can help Capgemini and similar corporate organizations improve decision quality, operational effectiveness, organizational performance, and long-term competitiveness. The overall findings of the source study similarly conclude that information accessibility, leadership style, organizational culture, technology use, employee involvement, risk assessment, teamwork, and prompt action positively influence managerial decision-making.
Dean, J. W., Jr., & Sharfman, M. P. (1996). Does decision process matter? A study of strategic decision-making effectiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 39(2), 368–396.Eisenhardt, K. M., & Zbaracki, M. J. (1992). Strategic decision making. Strategic Management Journal, 13(S2), 17–37.Elbanna, S., & Child, J. (2007). Influences on strategic decision effectiveness: Development and test of an integrative model. Strategic Management Journal, 28(4), 431–453.Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263–291.March, J. G., & Simon, H. A. (1958). Organizations. Wiley.Mintzberg, H., Raisinghani, D., & Théorêt, A. (1976). The structure of “unstructured” decision processes. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21(2), 246–275.Nutt, P. C. (2002). Why decisions fail: Avoiding the blunders and traps that lead to debacles. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.Shepherd, N. G., & Rudd, J. M. (2014). The influence of context on the strategic decision-making process: A review of the literature. International Journal of Management Reviews, 16(3), 340–364.Simon, H. A. (1947). Administrative behavior: A study of decision-making processes in administrative organization. Macmillan.Vroom, V. H., & Yetton, P. W. (1973). Leadership and decision-making. University of Pittsburgh Press.
Publication Date
8/27/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
2
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...