Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
10.55041/IJSREM.GSTCOS123
Volume:
10 |
7 |
Jul 2026
Pages:
1-10
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
MBA
CMR College of Engineering & Technology
Assistant professor, Department of MBA
CMR College of Engineering & Technology Hyderabad
This study examines the impact of lifelong learning models on employee skill development, knowledge enhancement, and organizational competitiveness at TalentSprint. Using a quantitative research approach, data were collected from 80– 120 employees through structured questionnaires and analysed using correlation and regression techniques. The study focused on learning practices such as continuous training programs, digital learning platforms, knowledge-sharing culture, and professional development initiatives. Findings indicate that lifelong learning models significantly improve employee skills and knowledge, leading to higher productivity, improved employee performance, and stronger competitive advantage. Among the variables, knowledge-sharing culture emerged as the most influential factor in enhancing organizational competitiveness. The statistical analysis confirmed positive relationships between learning initiatives and organizational outcomes, resulting in the rejection of the null hypotheses. The study concludes that fostering a continuous learning culture and implementing effective lifelong learning strategies are essential for sustainable organizational growth, employee development, and long-term competitive success in dynamic business environments.
KEYWORDS
Overall, the study concludes that organizations that invest in continuous learning and knowledge sharing are better positioned to a Overall, the study concludes that organizations that prioritize continuous learning and foster a culture of knowledge sharing are more likely to develop a highly skilled workforce and achieve sustainable competitive advantage. Therefore, investing in lifelong learning should be regarded not merely as a human resource practice but as a strategic imperative for enhancing organizational effectiveness, adaptability, and long-term competitiveness in an increasingly dynamic and knowledge-driven business environment.
· Argyris, C., & Schön, D. A. (1978). Organizational learning: A theory of action perspective. Addison-Wesley. · Becker, G. S. (1964). Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis, with special reference to education. Columbia University Press. · Billett, S. (2001). Learning in the workplace: Strategies for effective practice. Allen & Unwin. · Candy, P. C. (1991). Self-direction for lifelong learning: A comprehensive guide to theory and practice. Jossey-Bass. · Cross, K. P. (1981). Adults as learners: Increasing participation and facilitating learning. Jossey-Bass. · Davenport, T. H., & Prusak, L. (1998). Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know. Harvard Business School Press. · Drucker, P. F. (1999). Management challenges for the 21st century. HarperBusiness. · Ellinger, A. D. (2004). The concept of self-directed learning and its implications for human resource development. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 6(2), 158–177. https://doi.org/10.1177/1523422304263327 · Garvin, D. A. (1993). Building a learning organization. Harvard Business Review, 71(4), 78–91. · Gilley, J. W., & Eggland, S. A. (1989). Principles of human resource development. Addison-Wesley. · Jarvis, P. (2004). Adult education and lifelong learning: Theory and practice (3rd ed.). RoutledgeFalmer.
Publication Date
7/29/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
33
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...