Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
10.55041/IJSREM12563
Volume:
6 |
4 |
Apr 2022
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Realizing the utility of scoring systems in mortality prediction of critical ill patient admitted to medical intensive care units (MICUs), studies worldwide have expressed a need to validate the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score for databases of respective countries. Literature available in this area in the Indian context is scanty. The present study was undertaken to evaluate of quality of patient care in MICU in terms of APACHE score in predication of mortality risk, as well as in determination of model validity in critically ill patients in MICU. The study was prospectively carried out 2 months at MICU of a tertiary Institute in Bangalore, which admitted consecutive medical and surgical patients. Based on admission resource of MICU admission, a widely used ICU prognostic scoring model, the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) scoring system has been recognized. It has shown to be an accurate measurement of patient severity and correlates strongly with outcome in critical patients. Nonetheless, the qualified systematic database indicating APACHE II score, i.e. patient diagnosis, clinical condition, scientific parameters and laboratory values could hardly be established in routine.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
4/30/2022
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
14
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...