Crossref DOIMemberCiteFactoropen accessissn
SJIF Impact Factor 8.659 | ISSN: 2582-3930
IJSREM Logo

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management

(Gateway to Global Scholars - An International, Scholarly, Multi-Disciplinary, Open Access Journal)

Peer-Reviewed Journal Designed to Meet UGC's Quality Parameters

HomeCurrent IssuePast IssuesPay OnlineConferencesEditorial BoardAbout UsContact Us
IJSREM

Loading article...

Follow Us

  • Google Scholar
  • ResearchGate
  • Academia.edu
  • Mendeley
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Instagram

Journal Policies

  • Peer Review Policy
  • Publication Ethics
  • Copyright Infringement
  • Refund & Cancellation Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Journal Identifiers & Licenses

  • ISSN Verified: 2582-3930ISSN Verified: 2582-3930
  • Crossref DOI: 10.55041Crossref DOI: 10.55041
  • SJIF Ranking: 08.659SJIF Ranking: 08.659
  • Licensed under CC BY 4.0Licensed under CC BY 4.0
  • ISO Certification: 9001:2015ISO Certification: 9001:2015
  • Indexed & Cited In: Google ScholarIndexed & Cited In: Google Scholar

Contact Us

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management (IJSREM)

#62/1, New No 7, 1st Cross, 2nd Main, Ganganagar, R T Nagar, Bangalore North, Bangalore, Karnataka, India – 560032
[email protected]+91 93911 67991
logos
logos
Working Hours

Mon – Sat: 9:00 AM – 6:00 PM

Sunday: 10:00 AM – 4:00 PM

+91 93911 67991

© 2026 IJSREM – International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management. This is an open-access journal. Articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
ArticlePeer ReviewedOpen AccessPlagiarism Passed
Paper ID:IJSREM67399

A Study on Performance Evaluation of Selected Mid Cap Mutual Funds in India: An Analysis of Historic Returns, Risk Ratios, and SIP Returns

Stream/Area:

-

Subject:

-

Paper ID:

IJSREM67399

Volume:

10 |

9 |

Sep 2026

Pages:

1-11

Publication Frequency:

Monthly (12 issues per year)

DOI
Digital Object Identifier
10.55041/IJSREM67399

License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

Share this article:

Authors

DR. CHETNA TANSUKHBHAI PARMAR

DR. CHETNA TANSUKHBHAI PARMAR

School of Management & Entrepreneurship

GSFC University

Download Author Certificate

Author Services & Downloads

Full ArticlesAcceptance Certificate

Abstract

Mid cap equity mutual funds occupy a distinctive position in the Indian mutual fund industry, offering investors a growth potential that lies between the stability of large cap funds and the volatility of small cap funds. With the Indian mutual fund industry's assets under management crossing ₹80 lakh crore in 2025 and Systematic Investment Plan (SIP) contributions reaching record monthly inflows, understanding the comparative performance of mid cap schemes has become critical for both retail and institutional investors. This research paper undertakes a comprehensive performance evaluation of 58 mid cap equity mutual fund schemes (comprising 29 distinct schemes across Direct and Regular plans) using secondary data drawn from the Moneycontrol.com Mid Cap Fund Performance Tracker, covering historic point-to-point returns (1 week to 10 years), risk ratios (Standard Deviation, Beta, Sharpe Ratio, Jensen's Alpha, and Treynor's Ratio), and SIP returns (1 to 10 years). Descriptive statistics, correlation analysis, independent-samples t-tests, and cross-tabulation by CRISIL rating were employed to analyse the data. The findings reveal that mid cap funds delivered a mean 3-year lumpsum return of approximately 21.7% with a mean Sharpe Ratio of 1.19, that Direct Plans outperformed Regular Plans by an average of 1.4 percentage points over three years (attributable to lower expense ratios), and that Sharpe Ratio and Treynor's Ratio are very strongly correlated with medium-term returns (r > 0.90), while Standard Deviation and Beta show only weak association with returns. Funds with higher CRISIL ratings (4 and 5 star) consistently displayed both higher average returns and higher risk-adjusted performance, validating CRISIL ratings as a reasonably reliable screening tool. The study concludes with practical recommendations for investors, fund managers, and regulators, and outlines directions for future research.

KEYWORDS

Mid Cap Mutual Funds; Performance Evaluation; Risk-Adjusted Returns; Sharpe Ratio; Treynor's Ratio; Jensen's Alpha; Systematic Investment Plan (SIP); Direct vs Regular Plan; CRISIL Rating; Indian Mutual Fund Industry

Cite This Article

DR. CHETNA TANSUKHBHAI PARMAR, "A Study on Performance Evaluation of Selected Mid Cap Mutual Funds in India: An Analysis of Historic Returns, Risk Ratios, and SIP Returns," International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management, vol. 10, no. 9, pp. 1-11, Sep 2026. https://doi.org/10.55041/IJSREM67399

Full Article/Conclusion

This study set out to evaluate the performance of selected mid cap mutual fund schemes in India using historic returns, risk ratios, and SIP returns data. The analysis confirms that mid cap funds, as a category, have delivered attractive risk-adjusted returns over the study period, with the average scheme rewarding investors with more than one unit of excess return per unit of risk taken (mean Sharpe Ratio of 1.19). More importantly, the study demonstrates that risk-adjusted measures — particularly the Sharpe Ratio and Treynor's Ratio — are considerably more informative than raw volatility or beta for identifying funds likely to deliver superior returns, since raw risk measures explained only a small fraction of return variation in this sample. The consistent outperformance of Direct Plans over Regular Plans, without any corresponding increase in risk, reinforces a now well-established finding in the literature: cost matters, and the choice between Direct and Regular plans is primarily an economic decision about distribution cost rather than a risk-return trade-off. For investors comfortable conducting their own research, Direct Plans represent a straightforward, no-additional-risk route to higher net returns; for those requiring advisory support, the incremental cost of a Regular Plan should be weighed consciously against the quantifiable long-term return drag it entails. The strong association observed between CRISIL ratings and both return and risk-adjusted performance suggests that such third-party ratings, despite their limitations, remain a reasonably reliable starting point for retail investors who lack the time or expertise to compute Sharpe, Treynor, and Jensen measures independently. However, the wide dispersion of performance even within similarly rated funds indicates that ratings should complement, rather than replace, a fuller risk-adjusted evaluation of the kind undertaken in this paper. Overall, the study reaffirms the enduring relevance of Modern Portfolio Theory-based performance measures — over sixty years after Markowitz (1952), Sharpe (1964, 1966), Treynor (1965), and Jensen (1968) first proposed them — for evaluating actively managed equity mutual funds in a rapidly growing but still-maturing market like India. As SIP participation continues to expand across smaller cities and lower-ticket-size investors, continued, updated empirical evaluation of fund categories such as mid cap funds will remain essential to protecting and enhancing retail investor outcomes.

References

Agrawal, R., & Jain, M. (2024). Assessment of Systematic Investment Plan (SIP) as an effective investment tool for retail investors in India. Journal of Financial Planning Studies, 6(1), 12–21. Ananthasuresh, K., Prasad, R., & Menon, S. (2023). Factors influencing investors' decisions, preferred schemes, and investment patterns in Indian mutual funds. International Journal of Commerce and Management Research, 9(4), 55–63. Association of Mutual Funds in India. (2025a). AMFI annual report – Fiscal 2025. https://www.amfiindia.com/Themes/Theme1/downloads/AMFI_AnnualMFReport2025.pdf Association of Mutual Funds in India. (2025b). AMFI monthly note – March 2025. https://www.amfiindia.com/Themes/Theme1/downloads/AMFIMonthlyNote_March2025.pdf Association of Mutual Funds in India. (2026). Indian mutual fund industry's average assets under management (AUM). https://www.amfiindia.com/articles/indian-mutual Aurora, R. S. (2020). A study on investor perception about Systematic Investment Plan (SIP) in the city of Mumbai. Gyan Management Journal, 14(2), 28–43. Bhatia, A., Chandani, A., & Chhateja, J. (2020). Robo advisory and its potential in addressing the behavioral biases of investors: A qualitative study in the Indian context. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, 25, Article 100281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbef.2020.100281 Bhattacharya, H. (2021). Rise of retail investors in Indian equity markets post-COVID. Indian Journal of Capital Markets, 15(4), 18–24. Bouddha, S. N., & Manjunath, K. R. (2024). Performance evaluation of large cap equity growth plans of mutual funds in India using risk-adjusted measures. International Journal of Research and Analytical Reviews, 11(3), 210–219. Carhart, M. M. (1997). On persistence in mutual fund performance. The Journal of Finance, 52(1), 57–82. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1997.tb03808.x

Editorial & Review Transparency

Publication Date

9/23/2026

Peer Review Type

Double-Blind Peer Review

Review Rounds: 2

Documents

Review Report (Confidential)
Copyright Form (Office)

Article Metrics & Impact

Article Views

0

Total views since publication

PDF Downloads

2

Total downloads since publication

Geographic Reach

5

Indexing, Archiving & Preservation

Google Scholar
Academia
ResearchGate
Crossref
SSRN
Semantic Scholar
Thomson Reuters
WorldCat
Mendeley
OpenAlex
EBSCO
Zenodo

Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.

Ethics, Compliance & Transparency

Plagiarism Screening

This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.

Funding Information

No funding information available for this research.

Similar & Recommended Articles

Similar Articles by Topic

Related research in the same subject area

Loading similar articles...